It’s not just lemmy that’s benefiting from Elon Musk.

  • @o0joshua0o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    942 years ago

    He has so thoroughly ruined Twitter that you can’t help but wonder if that was his goal from the outset.

    • appel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      To what end, though? The man blew 44b on a site that apparently was only worth 5-10b, and that was before he ran it into the ground. He also destroyed his reputation and the mystique as “genius entrepreneur” which the world can now clearly see he never was.

      I can’t think of a single net positive. I think it’s an age old tale with people with too much money: he fell victim to an over inflated ego and too many yes men aiming to please. He started to believe he really was brilliant.

      Sad thing is the man has so much money he still can’t fail, personally. He’ll have destroyed Twitter and even more people will lose their jobs. And autocrats around the world will be pleased. Musk will just shrug, tell himself it wasn’t his fault, “it was the libs” or something, and move on.

      Eta: the only winners here, as per usual, are the shareholders.

      • @Moob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        Foil hat time. Twitter was at one point a huge communications platform. People got news and opinions on daily happening almost immediately. He has successfully purchased that platform and destroyed the faith people had in it, in time for some of the most controversial events in recent history.

        • appel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          I mean, sure, assuming he doesn’t mind paying for that with 44 billion of his own dollar bucks, the devaluation of his other companies and the evaporation of his personal reputation.

          • @Moob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            Which is where my conspiracy theory falls apart. It mainly rests on fact that most of these decisions seem deliberate. Even an idiot by this point might start worrying about the loss of money. As much as he has, 40bil is considerable.

            • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              92 years ago

              It’s not his money though, so your theory hasn’t really fallen apart. Some of it his money but he’s been hanging with the saudis and murdoch.

              • @sfgifz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -12 years ago

                Considering that most of the market was stupidly overpriced, if you had 100b of worth in overpriced stock, and you had to choose between spending it or waiting for it to lose value over the next few months, what would you do?

                • @PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  32 years ago

                  I wouldn’t buy Twitter, fire everyone, chase off a lot of the good people and then change the name. If I felt like Twitter was the only plan, I would have negotiated a fair price, worked with the people on what was already working and wasn’t, kept everyone on until you knew how it ran, kept the worldwide, known name and probably paid my rent, lol. I’m not a “genius” in business, but I do know that this is probably the best I could have done.

      • @Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        IMO Mush was trying to run a simple pump and dump scheme with Twitter stock. You know, make some statements about ho he’s going to buy it at a massively inflated price, sell all the stock during the uptick and then suddenly find some issue with the sale and leave. However, during the “make some statements” phase he managed to make some legally binding statements and Twitter and their lawyers held him to them.

        So there’s no agenda or plan really, just a larger version of the Dogecoin pump and dumps that Mush has done in the past. It’s just this time rather than some crypto rubes he tried running it on a company with lots of lawyers and it blew up in his face.

        • appel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Agreed, very plausible scenario. It played out that way as well, right up to the part where his lawyers told him “you legally can’t actually walk away from this deal”.

    • ssillyssadass
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Elon is a narcissistic idiot, but that’s all he is. He bought the same crap his own PR team was peddling a few years ago, figured he didn’t need his PR team because he was so great (according to propaganda they spread), and went on to confidently make idiotic decisions because of course the real life Tony Stark can make no mistakes

    • PHLAK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    • Username02
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Narcissists like him would never seek failure intentionally.

      • @thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        You’ve obviously never played a board game with a narcissist. Flipping over the table and calling everyone, including the game they themselves purchased, cheaters is a totally expected move.

      • Balder
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s just like Michael from The Office. You see he isn’t doing things on purpose to sabotage everyone, but he can’t control it, he needs the attention and the self worship.

    • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I wonder if his goal isn’t for Twitter to be successful. I’m wondering if political influence will help to get cushty deals or legislative changes favourable to Tesla or SpaceX.

      Why worry about losing $30bn from one hand when you gain $100bn in another?

    • @BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Honestly even if the executive wanted to crash Twitter on purpose I’m not sure they could have done as good as Musk.

      He’s carefully destroying the brand, the infrastructure, the finances and the credibility of Twitter.

      You can’t be too quick because then people would take about for maybe a month and move over.

      No it had to be slow and painful so everyone start to really hate it.

  • Tygr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    692 years ago

    It’s not the rebrand that’s killing Twitter. Elon is. He’s proving to himself that he cannot, in fact, run Twitter better than the prior owners.

    • @hairinmybellybutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      I wonder if previous twitter execs are feeling a bit bad to have sold him twitter to see it destroyed like that.

      I mean it certainly proves Elon is an idiot as he used fraud to manipulate the price and got played instead.

      But was it worth it to let him destroy Twitter just because he tried to defraud it?

      • Tygr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I’d be bummed out but happy I have an unlimited supply of hundred dollar bills to wipe away the tears.

      • @KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I’m sure the previous execs are crying into their wads of cash. So much sympathy for them.

        Lol. Like if they gave a shit they would have forced that buyout to go through.

      • @flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        They got $44 billion, double what sane people thought the company was worth. It would be irresponsible not to take Elon for a ride.

  • miz_elektro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 years ago

    Just deleted my Twitter account. Of course, the app gave nothing but errors so I had to do it on desktop, but it’s done!

    • Polar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I deleted all of mine and move to mastodon when I heard Elon was possibly going to buy it. I’m glad I did, because who knows what he has all implemented since then.

      I am sure my account was never “deleted”, even under Jack, but at least I know I gave the best chance for my data to be deleted.

      • JoYo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        they’re prob ddosing themselves for failing the purity tests.

        • @DarthBueller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I had one tell me “you know nothing about communism, stop talking,” and I was like, oh, that’s right, I know nothing despite being well informed about the history of workers movements going back to the 1840s, Das Kapital, the Manifesto, and despite these noble ideals, the fact that every single communist government relied on purges to accomplish its goals, formed an exclusionary ruling class, and were corrupt as fuck. Fucking teenagers and their black and white thinking.

          • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            But you see, that wasn’t real Communism. Communism is a great and perfect egalitarian society by definition, so when it inevitably devolves into just another brand of stratification and oppression then it’s not Communism anymore. Next time it’ll work, though. We’ll still follow exactly the same formula that’s failed spectacularly every time it’s been tried, but this time it’ll work. For reasons. And if you say otherwise you’re just a status-quo liberal (never mind the fact that those supposed status-quo liberals are the ones implementing real tangible change that actually affect peoples’ lives while all the Communists do is endlessly wank about some glorious revolution that’ll happen some time in the nebulous future.)

          • Ann Archy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            When people say stuff like that it’s not about politics, it’s straight up about gatekeeping.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      At least it’s open for collaboration so people who can or help contribute to fix bugs for them are able to do so. That’s the beauty of open source, anyone can help out.

  • @Tapioca@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    There were stories that Tesla had a team in place to distract Elon any time he showed up to the office, and I absolutely believe that. Now that Elon has Twitter to distract him, I wonder what that team is up to.

  • @s1vgm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I’ve been trying to stick to Mastodon and ditch Twitter, but honestly, even though I’ve gotten into the habit of using Mastodon every day, it’s pretty hard for me to resist accepting information from Twitter.

    • drewofdoom
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      It’s ok to get information from places like X/Twitter or Reddit. It’s even fine to have an account. But it’s better to post your OWN material to platforms that best align with your sensibilities.

    • @Krachsterben@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      My issue with Mastodon is that many big companies still use Twitter/X as their main way to publish news outside of of their websites and press releases.

      • TheWoozy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I’m not usually interested in what big companies have to say, but I follow some journalists who fortunately cross post to Mastodon, but all discussion takes place on elmo’s X site.

    • mihor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      What? I’ve been using Squawker and lately it stopped working because monkey boy elon borked something again in the twitter api. No tweets for me.

  • Ann Archy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Can we have something nice here please? I miss when the internet was nice, and you were allowed to talk to each other about whatever you wanted.

    TRON FIGHTS FOR THE USER!

      • IninewCrow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Throughout history, the wealthy always have a habit of congratulating themselves on work that others have created while doing their absolute best to mess everything up.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I don’t know what’s going on here but I’m just glad to be part of something.

      • Ann Archy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Thank you! I got it off the back off a well fed lady!

  • @scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Honestly, I joined Twitter begrudgingly in 2015 after ignoring it for years only because I thought it might be easy to keep up with some interesting news before it hit Reddit… and it worked for a while…

    Now, I just wonder why I’m still there at all.

    I also don’t.see why I might want a mastodon account at this point though… I don’t feel like I need a replacement for something that I never really liked…

  • @egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    Apparently, as a competitor of any major platform you just need to get close to the features your adversary has and wait for that site/service to start the process of enshittification, let’s see if reddit makes more blunders

    • @martinmine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      I feel that reddit is already at this stage. It started feeling more like a half-bombed corporate minefield so I decided to flee the site one week ago. This site feels much more like things should be. You can even browse on a decent site on your phone.

  • @Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    Why are people so fucking addicted to Twitter? It’s just people posting a few sentences about shit I see on the Internet already. But what do I know, I’ve gone my entire life without using the stupid shit. Maybe I’m not taking into account how many people want to be internet celebrities with their parroted tweets and recycled jokes. Why is it so hard to make another site where dumbass celebrities can feed 2 lines to the drooling masses?

    • @t_jpeg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      Twitter culture (depending on what parts of twitter you were on) was really hard to explain. Unless you used it and really knew how to, you don’t really get the benefit from it. Its feed structure combine with post length and algorith meant that it was really easy for you to know what other people were saying about things going on right now (reality shows, football matches etc). It also made searching for news so easy (due to its Trending feature), so you were kept in the loop about things.

      The meme culture of Twitter was also very unique. I can say with absolute confidence that Twitter memes were bomb (before Musk ruined it). Way better than any memes I’d come across on Reddit or Lemmy so far.

      The only problem is you had to take Twitter in small doses. Stan culture and cyber-bullying culture were real negatives of Twitter. Certain people on that app were unhinged and that went unchecked because of how echo-chambers were set by the algorithm. You really had to check yoursel to make sure you weren’t being corrupted, especially because cyber-bullying was so normalised there (at least in my experience).

    • @danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I’m there for the artists. A ton of artists share their artwork on Twitter because of the enshittification of deviantART. I am not sure where they will end up now.

  • Beefalo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    that’s cool. The Masto instance I’ve been on for the last half year is no longer available and I’ll have to start over because I didn’t have a main and a back up account like I ended up with on Lemmy, but sure, that’s alright. I have no idea what happened, the instance still has a blank page up, but it ain’t Mastodon.

    I was finally feeling moved in but now, kaput.

    I don’t think this thing was really ready for absolutely everyone on Twitter to bail onto it, is the problem. I don’t think it was ever supposed to be. It was always supposed to be like a clubhouse for people who didn’t mind being the dweebs of the internet.

  • solidsnake2085
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Good, isn’t this what people want? Twitter to shut down? I’ve been hoping he just closes up shop and gets rid of it.

  • @dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There’s an ethical consideration when you sell a company. Dorsey and co. took a big payout and this is the result. I was thinking earlier about how this probably wouldn’t have been happened if you had an even equity split across the company’s employees.

  • @Rearsays@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    I don’t think I cared about Twitter, the entire duration of its existence, and now there’s a whole new thing that’s apparently the same and I still don’t care about