• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Waste of energy. It’s like asking a person to estimate a non-trivial angle. Either use a model trained for that task, or don’t bother.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        You’d expect the same answer each time. It’s the same photo, the same model, the same question. But you won’t get the same answer.

        I don’t know what ads show that, but anyone who knows the first thing about LLMs knows you don’t get the same answer twice.

        I’d get this expectation 5 years ago when most people weren’t familiar with it, but come on… you don’t need to feed it an image 500 times to see that.

    • Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      26 days ago

      The point is that:

      1. It is being used for ut, even though it is obviously not capable of giving a reliable and realistic answer
      2. It allows this usage, even though it is dangerous and not within it’s capabilities
      3. Each model gives answers that vary wildly, something that a human wouldn’t do. A human wouldn’t give you answers that are 10x more for the same question randomly.