It takes most college students at least four years to earn a bachelor’s degree. Christie Williams finished in three months.

The North Carolina human resources executive spent two months racking up credits through web tutorials after work in 2024, then raced through 11 online classes at the University of Maine at Presque Isle in four weeks. Later that year, she went back to earn her master’s – in just five weeks. The two degrees cost a total of just over $4,000.

Since then, she has coached a thousand other students on how to speed through the state college, shaving off years and thousands of dollars from the usual cost of a degree.

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked. “It’s kind of a no-brainer if you know about it.”

Many U.S. schools have been experimenting with ways to speed up traditional college programs to reduce the burgeoning cost and help students move into the workforce faster. Some offer three-year bachelor’s programs, reducing the number of credits needed for a diploma by one quarter. Many more allow students to enroll in college classes while still in high school.

But the breakneck pace of the fastest online programs concerns some academics, who say there is a big difference in what students can learn in weeks or months compared with three or more years.

The phenomenon – sometimes referred to as degree hacking, college speed runs or hyperaccelerated degrees – has spawned a cottage industry of influencers making videos about how quickly they earned their degrees and encouraging others to follow suit.

Supporters of the approach tout it as an affordable, convenient way for people to earn credentials they need for their careers. Others, including some online students and academic officials, expressed concern about what the super-accelerated students are missing, and whether a quick path devalues degrees.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    I’ve already spent more than 4 years in college with little to show for it. If speed-running college to get that piece of paper at the end is what it takes. more power to them.

  • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Completely lost sight of the purpose of education, which has nothing to do with being an effective corporate drone… unless you get a business degree, in which case 4 weeks is too long.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The point of paying for a college degree is to get a job. Education can be done for free, or the coat of printing out pirated textbooks at most. We don’t need institutions to learn

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m of two minds about this. So many jobs out there require a college degree when the work itself doesn’t really require a college degree to do. People who can’t afford to go to college but are able to do the work are locked out of that more comfortable life. This makes it easier to get that foot in the door.

    At the same time, you learn A LOT about life and people in those 3 or 4 years at college. It’s a shame for someone to miss out on that experience. Also, this speed run absolutely could not work for a STEM degree.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I keep saying it about AI written essays, but it applies here: College as we know it is bullshit and I hope this technology sparks the fire that burns it down.

      The business model of quasi-requiring all young people to spend 4 years going into massive debt for the privilege of mostly repeating high school needs to die.

      This shit about “become a well-rounded individual” also needs to die. That nonsense came about in the mid-20th century when it seemed industry, automation and electrical gadgetry was going to free us of toil, that in the future, George Jetson spends 3 hours a day, 3 days a week putting his feet up on his desk, so schools should teach art and music and literature classes to give people healthy hobbies so they know what to do with all this time they have. Wash that through the baby boomer intellect and it comes out “EXPLAIN THE THEMES IN WUTHERING HEIGHTS OR DIE A DITCH DIGGER.”

      No such reduction in toil has happened. Artificial, gaseous toil has been created that expands to take up all available time.

      We cling to this idea that “You are young. This is school time. You learn until you’re adult. When adult, you stop learn and start work. Never school again only work.” Which is the dumbest thing ever. We should offer all kinds of classes to all ages of people. You should be able to take a sociology class as a 38 year old man as casually as you can take yoga. Formal courses of study should be for earning certifications. You want to fly a plane? You need to complete this entire syllabus and take and pass this lengthy practical test so that we’re sure you won’t negligently crash into a neighborhood. You want to be a civil engineer? You need to complete this entire syllabus and pass this lengthy practical test so that we’re sure you won’t negligently sign off on a building that will collapse.

      Humanities classes, arts and crafts, fine arts, culinary skills…this stuff needs to be available to anyone who wants them and not tacked onto technical training as a way to wring more money out of students.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I disagree with a lot of what you are saying. I actually think it is very important to be well-rounded individuals and think general electives should be required (even though I absolutely hated them when I was in college). There is a reason why left-leaning people are more likely to have a college education and right-leaning people are less likely to have a college education. It isn’t because people on the left are smart enough to go to college or have the money to, it’s that more move to the left afterwards because going to college teaches you about life outside your small area and teaches you about people who are different from you. The same thing happens in humanities classes, whether you take them at college or not. They broaden your experience outside of just technical stuff. I think that is very important to building a society of people who care about other people and who want to make the world better for others besides themselves.

        I also think you have it wrong about “That nonsense came about in the mid-20th century when it seemed industry, automation and electrical gadgetry was going to free us of toil.” Universities were almost COMPLETELY about creating well-rounded people for a thousand years. It is only in the last hundred or so years that college has been about creating a targeted workforce. The first trade school wasn’t “invented” until 1823, and they didn’t become a big thing until after WWII in the 1940s. Universities pumping out engineers became a thing with land-grant schools in the late 1880s. Basically, the industrial revolution in the 1800s shifted college from creating well-rounded people to being focused on careers. “Majors” weren’t invented until 1885 (at Indiana University, which seems weird to me that it was invented there). Before that, you just took a whole bunch of electives based on what you were interested in or whatever your advisor was interested in. In the 1600s when Harvard and Yale were built, they were built for the reason you specifically say came about in the 20th century.

        “This was an especially English ideal, realized in the colleges that made up the universities at Oxford and Cambridge. There, students studied, lived, and worshiped in communities with their teachers—and they would do the same at Harvard and Yale. In that way, education became not merely a training of mind or a preparation for profession, but a comprehensive experience meant to develop character, to develop the whole human being in all its dimensions- intellectual, moral, personal.”

        It is true that requiring a general education as part of a set curriculum came about in the early-20th century, but that’s only because so many people were only going to college to get professional skills that schools needed to figure out a way to structure and standardized what was never structured or standardized in the past.

        I do agree with you that we should make available to anyone at any age humanities classes. And I do agree trade/certification schools are an awesome way to create a better life for yourself or simply to get to do thing you want to do with your life. I also agree that requiring going into massive debt at expensive universities just to get basic jobs needs to die… but I want it to die by having universities be free to attend so anyone can have access to those basic jobs while also having access to a life-broadening experience.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As a victim of the education system, I’m totally in favor of starting from first principals and redesigning the whole system from the ground up.

  • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you can complete a masters degree in five weeks, it’s a degree mill and not a real degree. The average in-person masters degree requires 30 credit hours with 24 credits being above 500 level (graduate classes). Let’s do the math:

    If you take 15 credits per semester (5 classes typically), that would be 15 hours of class time for 12 weeks. For a 3 credit class this would be 3 hours per week of class time. If you condense this down to 5 weeks, that would be 36 hours of class time per week for five weeks.

    But remember, this is only half the required credits. So you have to multiply this by 2, leading to 72 hours per week of just class time.

    This does NOT include any outside work. Typically, 500 level classes give homework that can take 5-10 hours per week since it is a graduate level class. Let’s assume five hours to be generous.

    That would mean for a full semester (15 credit hours at 5 classes) one would be looking at 15 hours of class work per week plus 25 hours of homework/projects per week (5 classes x 5 hours of work per class). For a total of 40 hours per week.

    Condensing this down to 5 weeks would multiple this number by 2.4 (5 weeks instead of 12 weeks). And then multiplying it again by 2 since you would have to do both semesters in five weeks. That would be 192 hours of work per week for five weeks. There are 144 hours in a week. These places are degree mills.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Corollary: if you have the capability to complete the requirements in a short period you should be allowed to.

    • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I did a summer “mini-mester” for my undergrad Fluid Mechanics class where the class was condensed into 4 or 6 weeks but you met every day and it was FUCKING BRUTAL even though I was only doing that one course. I can’t imagine doing that for a full 15hrs of coursework. This smells more like a click through the classwork once randomly, figure out the right answers from the online quiz when they pop up at the end, then click the right answers the next time type of situation but for a whole program.

      How this got accredited (if it actually is) is beyond me.

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Agreed, I did something similar where I did 3 courses in 7 weeks and that was by far the worst and most stressful time of my entire degree. Anything more probably would have caused a nervous breakdown.

    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The problem is that many “legit” colleges are already degree mills, albeit at a slower pace. In the US at least, colleges are run like businesses. More students means more money. As long as they can maintain an okay reputation, they’ll churn as many students through as they can. The places that let you fast-track like this are just taking the next logical step, and letting the mask slip a little further. The whole system is broken; this is just another symptom.

      Not every institution is this way. In my area, there are one or two schools that consistently produce people who actually know something. But it’s a pretty small percentage, all things considered, and I expect the overton window will gradually lessen expectations at those places over time as well.

      • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Certainly not untrue. Many schools have gone the way of business. I wouldn’t go as far as to say it’s only a small percentage that are real degrees these day but it’s definitely lower than it should be.

        • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m guessing some areas/industries are better or worse. Mine seems pretty bad, at least in my area. Being involved in hiring co-ops and new grads has given me a good taste for what the expectations are like, and it’s not great. So my view is probably a bit dismal.

          • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That is a good point. You are probably right that it is area based. My degrees were in physics and to my knowledge, there aren’t too many online degrees for it. It’s pretty hard to fake your knowledge in this area. Even if you could, you’ll be found out quickly once starting a job.

        • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I wouldn’t go as far as to say it’s only a small percentage that are real degrees these day but it’s definitely lower than it should be.

          I agree. I think a lot of degrees are still real degrees, but the entire ecosystem has been degraded to the point that quality across the board has diminished. So, the most “rigorous” degrees now are equivalent to a run-of-the-mill degree a generation ago and so forth. Ultimately, the run-of-the-mill degrees of yesteryear are now just diploma mill degrees.

          I hate to say it, but a lot of it is e-learning and online degrees. It’s a lot harder to engage with material, with a class, or with the professor themselves behind a screen hundreds of miles away. Even when you put everything into the work, it still just is not as engaging because you don’t have the same dynamic because you can’t just drop by your professor’s office for office hours or get the same level of help or group learning. In undergrad, I used to help others in my classes, and vice-versa, while also going to office hours to clear up details. Online, if it’s not impossible, it’s at least orders of magnitude more difficult. So, the quality of learning drops a ton.

          If I go back for another Master’s or a Doctorate, I will only do in person classes.

    • davad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I largely agree, but one situation I can think of where condensing the work makes sense is experienced professionals who already meet the learning outcomes. Their goal is to prove that they know the material, then have a degree to show as proof, not to actually learn the material.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Kind of, but that would be a fault in the system that ideally would be charged. Maybe with some sort of verification to ensure they have the skills already. Maybe that’s even what this is abusing and they’re not examining enough / tolerant of LLMs yet. But agreed that is something a flaw with credentials

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    They’re concerned they won’t be able to keep fucking people with four years of fees funded by FAFSA loans they end up defaulting on

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You won’t be able to remember anything you learned if you whoosh on by. You should suffer at least a little bit from learning it, then it’ll stick much better.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly a lot of education doesn’t stick either way. Repetition and living the lessons is what really makes learning stick.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah it seems like the only thing they really learned was how to grift and exploit systems, not an ounce of appreciation for the creation, synthesis, or archival of knowledge. Like the degree equivalent of a speed reading scam, all surface no understanding or retention. There’s no time for spaced repetition which I think is critical for long term retention.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If I had this in my college years - impossible since we had no Internet available yet at all - I’d’ve been laughing. Stay home, stay online, and hack all the waking day? BSc in no time.

    A dear friend lived near the uni in her home town, and so lived with her mom, rent-free, and just went all-out on coursework. In 3 years she got and paid to receive a BA. She earned enough for a BSc too, but didn’t pay the fee for convocation and so doesn’t have it.

    Three years. Wow, would that have been awesome.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Everyone knows that lots of students dont learn in college but still graduate. Noone did anything about it.

    Everyone knows that going this fast means people definitely won’t learn. Noone is going to do anything about it.

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This sort of reminds me of that Kanye West School Spirit Skit about learning:

    You keep it going man, you keep those books rolling 
    You pick up those books you’re going to read 
    And not remember, and you roll man 
    You get that associate’s degree, okay 
    Then you get your bachelor’s, then you get your master’s 
    Then you get your master’s masters 
    Then you get your doctorate

    You go man, and then when everybody says quit 
    You show them those degrees man 
    When everybody says, "hey, you’re not working 
    “You’re not making any money” 
    You say, “look at my degrees and you look at my life 
    Yeah, I’m 52, so what?”

    Hate all you want 
    But I’m smart, I’m so smart, and I’m in school 
    These guys are out here, huh 
    Making money all these ways, and I’m spending mine to be smart 
    You know why? 
    Because when I die, buddy 
    You know what’s gonna keep me warm? 
    That’s right, those degrees

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This reads like someone heard “the unexamined life is not worth living” and responded with “nuh uh, why should I learn anything if I’m fighting for survival” like an education doesn’t help at all, might as well condemn everyone to a life of subsistence farming. The only reason we’re able to specialize into roles like rappers and doctors and engineers is because of education. Don’t mistake the mechanisms of academic bureaucracy and economics with the pursuit of truth and knowledge.

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I originally interpreted the lyrics as a view of commodified education where the prerequisite for a lot of jobs nowadays require a degree or two just to get past the AI review process.

        I didn’t mean to come off as knocking the pursuit of higher education. I mean I probably deserve it quoting a Kanye song! My wife has applied for her Masters next year, and I’m looking into the process of upgrading my advanced diploma into a degree myself. It just makes me laugh with frustration at how the ladder for success keeps adding rungs the higher you climb it.