• @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1642 years ago

    I think Google overestimates my Internet addiction and underestimates my steadfast hatred of advertisements.

    • @Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      322 years ago

      Been on chrome for like 12 years. Syncs across my phone, everything. I will make the switch. I have been wondering when google was going to go evil. Why not 2023 like everything else on the internet?

        • @Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Dodge v. Ford is arguably the court case that proves all capitalist owned companies are legally required to not do the right thing. If Google was worker owned they would be a lot better.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          When was thar? Because if memory serves, they started sharing and selling our data shortly after 9/11.

          They’ve been evil for a very long time.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -19
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        2 years from now Firefox will have blocked adblockers, and there will be chromium based browsers (not Chrome) that won’t have them blocked.

        I don’t see why people seem to be thinking a large company in a capitalistic landscape isn’t going to side with profits. Firefox will oppose it openly right now and take the new users and then move to the same without lube and without apologies.

        Small browsers that still have some morals before going public will build browers off chromium because of its ease, and they will be able to exclude those blocks. Likely means we will be using different browsers every few years until something else changes.

        Maybe I’m pessimistic here, but anyone who just moved from Reddit to Lemmy should know that Firefox isn’t the answer, it is another greed driven overlord.

        Mimicking the tokens on the otherhand… those sites we will need to boycott if possible.

        • @slapchop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 years ago

          This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read.

          Mozilla is a non-profit whose mission is to keep the internet freely available and privacy focused. See https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/who-we-are/

          Firefox is built by open source developers who overwhelmingly have those same values. They have also been at this for many years now and have given us no real reason to doubt this commitment.

          • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            “The majority of Mozilla’s revenue is generated from search functionality included in our Firefox product through all major search partners including Google, Bing, Yahoo, Yandex, Amazon, Ebay and others.”

            Everything you just said was optimistic as fuck.

            750 employees, 826 million dollars in revenue a year.

            So what do they choose. Fire 700 employees and go down to 26 mill revenue?

            Edit: when the hivemind disperses and sees Firefox follow Google in using tokens and blocking ad blockers, you may not see it as one of the dumbest thing you’ve read before.

        • @glockenspiel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          Makes no sense. Mozilla has no horse in the advertising race. But Google does. Almost all of Google’s profits are from ads. Ads keep the entire Alphabet house of cards afloat.

          But not Mozilla. The largest connection there is them being paid for default lt search engine.

          • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I read ~88% of its 800+ million dollar a year revenue comes from search engines.

            Surely if that’s true it would have no impact on their decisions /s

  • @clearleaf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    1302 years ago

    For anyone who thinks they’re “stuck” with chrome, Firefox has gotten it’s shit together massively in the last few years.

    • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      412 years ago

      Which is why Google’s next step is to effectively require chromium browsers for any websites wanting access to Google services and products.

      • @ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        232 years ago

        Feels bad but I can’t condone this behaviour anymore and I feel ashamed that I haven’t seen the greed Google is capable of doing.

        In the coming months I will do my best to migrate away from the Google system, even if I end up paying a tad more, maybe just in time to set up a home server for photos.

      • @rifugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sounds like a good reason to stop using Google services and products. Some examples (note, I haven’t used some of these yet):

        Search - DuckDuckGo

        Email - ProtonMail

        Drive - Dropbox

        Sheets/Docs - Zoho

        Some of these examples may not the best for everyone, but my point is that we do not have to let Google continue to push us around.

        • @grue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          37
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          No, it sounds like a good reason for anti-trust regulators to make an injunction to stop Google from doing it.

          It’s time for this fantasy bullshit notion that boycotts are worth a damn to end. In reality, it’s nothing but pro-corporate propaganda designed to make people think they’re “fighting the man” or whatever when they’re actually completely ineffective.

          Now, don’t get me wrong: by all means, please feel free to quit using Google’s shit! That’s 100% a good thing and I fully encourage it! Just don’t delude yourself into thinking it represents even the slightest shred of a solution to the systemic problem Google’s anticompetitive strategies represent.

        • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          It’s not you and me. It’s the websites. They’re not going to give up on having anyone with Chrome or using Google services from being able to access their sites. We’d end up with 2 Internets - one with Google and one without. And we all know that the one with Google will win.

          • @rifugee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            These are built from the open source version of Android and do not have Google stuff:

            • LineageOS
            • GrapheneOS (can be installed on Pixels)

            These are based on various flavors of Linux (Android is technically a flavor of Linux too):

            • PureOS (Librem 5 line by Purism)
            • Ubuntu Touch (support for lots of devices, but typically not the flagships)
            • Manjaro OS (on PinePhone by PINE64, an open source hardware community, which is the best way I can describe it)
      • @OfficerBribe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        There is no way anything like this would ever go through. Google’s own lawyers would quickly put a stop at this. It is known that Google sometimes has used features that for Firefox is problematic at least for YouTube, but it eventually is resolved by changes in FF

      • @Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Oh, but it will not be GOOGLE’s next step. I dont think it is the goal anyway. They only need to help site owners to sign up to their WEI thing, and there will be oh so many incentives. Google will be happy to license it out, or even make the toolkit fully opensource, to whoever wants to implement it in their browser, regardless of the engine used. Their obvious ultimate goal is to show the ads with no interruptions, which also happens to be the desire of most of the websites. And many websites will willingly implement it on their side, they do not really need too much encouragement.

    • @panda_paddle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      262 years ago

      I dont understand when people think Firefox didn’t have their shit together. Been using it since 2006 and never had an issue. Ya’ll must be doing some serious browsing.

      • @thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        Been using since release. I never felt like I was making some kind of compromise by using it. Firefox always had their shit together from my experience.

        Now, it’s on par with Chrome or better than (tradeoffs and personal preference), even for developing web apps. Firefox dev tools pull ahead of Chrome’s, then Chrome catches up and does something new and useful, then Firefox catches up, and so forth.

        Firefox is good. It’s not like “I’m leaving Photoshop for the GIMP” kind of thing-- It’s like “I’m leaving Honda for Toyota.”

      • @wolfpack86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        When chrome was released, Firefox felt bloated visually and slow. I switched to chrome with the initial release, then tried to come back to Firefox some years later. Still felt like it was slow.

        Im back trying it again. The desktop browser seems to work alright, but I’m growing weary of the Android app.

      • @sock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        i remember it looking pretty sketchy and bad back in the day while chrome looked a lot nicer and user friendly

        im a firefox user now i think chrome looks ugly compared to firefox nowadays

      • @Koffiato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Did they lift the “only curated extensions” bullshit yet? I’m on Kiwi just to be able to run my own (unpacked) extensions that FF doesn’t let me do so.

    • @NamesArrHard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Any idea if Firefox has a good translation extension? Like Chrome has Google translate that actively translates the sites you enter into English.

      I live in a country that I don’t speak the language of, so I often need to use websites and translate them to English, which is why I’ve been stuck with Chrome.

      • @teuniac_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        There are 36 pages of translation extensions. The official one works without the cloud, which is pretty unique.

        Personally I like the Immersive Translate extension. You can select your preferred translation engine (cloud based, but it supports many) and it shows you both the translated text and original text by alternating the paragraphs.

    • @CodeSalat@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      How can I disable autoplay after user interaction on mobile? On desktop this works via about:config but there’s no such thing for mobile.

    • @OfficerBribe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      There have been quite a few questionable decisions by Mozilla though, they have focused on some very weird things, not to mention scandals about management salaries (No idea how it is now). I really really hope they will not follow suite which honestly is not as far fetched as one could think.

    • setVeryLoud(true);
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I don’t think FF supports PWAs yet. I need to use Chromium to turn some sites like Discord into PWAs, as the desktop Linux version doesn’t screen share on Wayland. I also like having YTM as an app.

    • @rndll@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -12 years ago

      Firefox is the only browser on Android which still doesn’t have tabs. Wrangling multiple tabs on a tablet or foldable is just a pain on Firefox. Chrome on standard screen sizes even has tab groups. Until then, Firefox is a no go for me.

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    392 years ago

    This is just more of the same. Every time some company thinks they’ve thrown enough money at the problem to DRM their way to success, somebody inevitably finds a fix, workaround, or bypass. Sometimes within a single day.

    • @nonearther@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      The main issue is that no-one in past, be it movie, music, or gaming industry, had the control which Google has with the web.

      Web is 90% Chromium, Email is 60+% Gmail, Android is 70+% mobile worldwide, and Google already provides a lot of things like Google login, oAuth, etc. for free.

      This means for a web dev, making a website WEI compatible shouldn’t be much of a hassle, and if they protest, Google can totally twist their arms to get us way.

      WEI is dangerous because who’s behind it, not because what it is.

  • @Silversw0rd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Stopped even looking at chrome since yrs. If they force their services even via chrome based browsers, I will dump their offerings as much as possible.

    • @intrepid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Google has kicked up such a revolt that I find it easy to convince everyone to use Firefox. If they think they can keep abusing their userbase like this, then they are in for a surprise.

  • BassaForte
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 years ago

    I stopped using chrome as my primary browser years ago, and everyone should do the same.

  • Gianni R
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Baffling seeing the “well, [chromium based browser] has adblock in [X Y Z] form.” Use the browser that will actually prevent this from disaster from happening again, which is Firefox.

  • The dogspaw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Oh no Bernie Sanders has turned heel and joid forces with Google and he’s pissed

  • @MrRazamataz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Edge on (android, not sure about iOS) mobile has “Adblock Plus” built in that can be enabled. Sure, I’d rather UBlock Origin like on my pc but when/if that stops working on Edge desktop, I wonder if they’d add a similar built in thing to desktop…