I downloaded the movie after seeing it in theatre to once again enjoy it from the comfort of my home. Seeing 2160p, I thought it’s going to be a webcam rip but the title says webrip. Where is this leaked from that has Dolby Vision on a movie still in theatre?

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its not unheard of for some scene peeps to get access to the raw digital files played in some theaters. It’s uncommon because of the difficulty in acquisition and then sanitizing it so they can’t figure out who ripped it, but does happen.

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    Back in the early DVD days the studios would hand out DVD “screener” copies to film critics and magazines for reviews. They were often ripped and passed around when films were still in theatres. Often they had a watermark or subtitles in a different language but were otherwise top quality.

  • bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    if you have a good camera (2x number of pixels, and 2x colordepth than the movie), then you could make a camrip with perfect quality (assuming some calibration frames, and a cinema that gives no fuck). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist–Shannon_sampling_theorem

    though I guess that’s still too much effort for most, and most early leaks are digital copies, as the other comments suggest.

    edit: newer comments suggest camrip with a bad camera

    • PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Would that be like on a tripod in the audience area recording the screen? Seems lossy somehow so I figure I’m misunderstanding. I’m pretty ignorant (~fully ignorant lol) about this, apologies, ya just piqued my curiosity.

      • bort@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Would that be like on a tripod in the audience area recording the screen?

        yes.

        Seems lossy somehow

        it is! but that’s where Shannon sampling theorem comes in. The sampling only needs to be twice as good as the source, and then you can reconstruct the source perfectly. (with some assumptions, e.g. correct color gamut, focal point, etc.).

    • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Default audio is in Spanish although English is available. Some but not all on-screen text has non removable Russian subtitles baked into the video. Could be worse.

      The Spanish sub&dub with on screen Russian is confusing

      • Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        oh shit then it makes sense!

        Russia is currently ignoring copyright. like. for real, so any breach is currently completely ignored there

        • RusAD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not completely. They still somewhat respect Chinese copyright, and to some extent copyright of other eastern countries (Korea, India, Japan, etc)

  • clag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This version has hard coded Cyrillic overlay for written text. If you can put up with that, then yes, it’s a great 2160p copy.