We all know the pictures of the astronauts on the ISS floating around. We also suspect that a lack of gravity is bad for the body as the muscles go weak and such.

Why don’t spaceships just rotate to cause the effect of artificial gravity through centrifugal forces?

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 months ago

    Small ships would have to rotate really fast to make 1G, and it’s not worth the trouble if nobody lives there permanently.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      interestingly bigger ships would have to rotate faster than small ships to achieve 1g btw

      this is due to smaller ships having a larger curvature so less velocity is needed

      edit: no wait i just did the maths again and you’re right. smaller ships need lower absolute velocity of the outside walls, but angular velocity is higher.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Key goals for both moon and mars missions is finding out how much gravity we need. We know we’re much healthier at 1G than in microgravity, but where is good enough? You can’t really draw a straight line to predict it. Does the moon have enough gravity for people to stay healthy long term? Does mars? Where should we set the rotation of a space station with artificial gravity?