• LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Since I am paywallwd a) is it BS b) what compounds?

    I am knowledgeable in ethnobotany and psychedelics and I cannot see what this might produce other than nausea and delirium.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s not about selling it as a product. it’s about determining what molecular pathways are interchangeable between plants, fungus and animals.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Berman et al., Sci. Adv. 12, eaeb3034 (2026) 1 April 2026

      S c i e n c e A d v

      A

      n c e

      S

      | R e

      S

      e

      A R

      c h A

      R

      t i c l e

      1 of 18

      P L A N T S C I E N C E S

      Complete biosynthesis of psychedelic tryptamines from

      three kingdoms in plants

      Paula Berman1,2

      *†, Janka Höfer 1

      †, Herschel Mehlman1

      , Efrat Almekias-Siegl1

      , Olga Khersonsky 3

      ,

      Younghui Dong 4

      ‡, Uwe Heinig4

      , Liron Sulimani5

      , Let Kho Hao1,2

      , Shahar Cohen2

      , Yoav Peleg4

      ,

      Sagit Meir1

      , Ilana Rogachev 1

      , David Meiri5

      , Sarel J. Fleishman3

      , Asaph Aharoni1

      *

      Psychedelic indolethylamines with therapeutic potential are naturally produced in plants, fungi, and animals.

      Here, we elucidated the complete N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) biosynthetic pathway in hallucinogenic plant

      species traditionally used in shamanic rituals for spiritual healing. Leveraging the similarities in their chemical

      structures, we reconstructed in one plant assay the full biosynthetic pathways of five renowned natural psyche-

      delics; psilocin and psilocybin found in mushrooms, DMT from plants, and bufotenin and 5-methoxy-DMT secret-

      ed by the Sonoran Desert toad. We further engineered halogenated analogs of these molecules, which do not

      naturally occur in plants and exhibit prospective therapeutic potential for psychiatric conditions. Blending cata-

      lytic functions across the tree of life, coupled with metabolic engineering guided by rational protein design of

      mutant enzymes, enabled substantially more efficient in planta production of the indolethylamine components.

      This work establishes a versatile platform for concurrent biosynthesis and diversification of psychoactive indole-

      thylamines, paving the way for their production in plants.

      INTRODUCTION

      For thousands of years, psychedelic substances have been used by

      indigenous cultures as entheogens in rituals intended to induce al-

      tered states of consciousness for spiritual and therapeutic purposes.

      Psilocybin-containing mushrooms were central to ancient Aztec

      ceremonies (1), while N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), the pri-

      mary psychoactive component of ayahuasca, has long been used

      in traditional Amazonian rituals. This ceremonial brew combines

      Psychotria viridis (a natural source of DMT) with Banisteriopsis caapi,

      which provides β-carboline monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibi-

      tors that render DMT orally active (1, 2). Similarly, 5-methoxy-N,N-

      dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT), found in the secretion of

      the Sonoran Desert toad (Incilius alvarius) and in several plant spe-

      cies, is thought to have been used ceremonially by indigenous

      groups in northern Mexico (3). 5-MeO-DMT has been described

      as the most potent DMT analog, being about 4- to 10-fold more po-

      tent than DMT in humans and is known to induce psychedelic ex-

      periences that are distinct from those of DMT (4). Knowledge of

      the traditional use of these molecules has fueled contemporary

      therapeutic interest in psychedelics as treatments for neuropsychiat-

      ric conditions.

      Recent studies have shown that classical indolethylamine psy-

      chedelics promote neuroplasticity and modulate serotonergic cir-

      cuits, primarily through 5-HT 2A receptor activation (5–7). These

      compounds have demonstrated therapeutic potential for depression,

      anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and addiction (5–8), with psi-

      locybin receiving Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough

      Therapy designation for major depressive disorder in 2019 (6, 7).

      Although widely considered hallucinogenic, psilocybin itself func-

      tions as a prodrug, undergoing enzymatic dephosphorylation in the

      digestive tract and liver to produce psilocin, the active compound

      responsible for its psychoactive effects. DMT is produced by a broad

      range of plant species and, in low abundance, by certain animals (2).

      When administered via smoking or intravenous injection, it pro-

      duces rapid and intense psychoactive effects that typically peak with-

      in 5 min and subside within 30 min, due to rapid metabolism by

      MAO enzymes in the liver. Coadministration with MAO inhibitors

      can extend the half-life of DMT in vivo (2). The traditional use of

      ayahuasca exemplifies how combining compounds from different

      sources can enable oral activity; however, such combinations require

      carefully balanced dosing to mitigate adverse effects associated with

      MAO inhibition (9).

      The expanding clinical interest in psychedelics as therapeutics

      has sparked the need for scalable and versatile production platforms

      and structural diversification (10, 11). Traditionally, the supply of

      psychedelics relies on natural producers, mainly plants, fungi, and

      the Sonoran Desert toad. Harvesting these organisms for their psy-

      choactive compounds raises ecological and ethical concerns, being

      increasingly threatened by habitat loss and overexploitation (12).

      While synthetic routes for these compounds are available and, in

      some cases, relatively straightforward, they still require compound-

      specific reactants, can lead to unwanted intermediates and prod-

      ucts, and require several processing steps (2, 13, 14). Biocatalys