I was sent this map without a source but I thought it was impressive nonetheless. It shows the SeaWorld parking lot in yellow. The green dot is where Orcas spend their lives.

edit: This is Seaworld San Diego, California

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jesus. The SeaWorld parks in San Antonio and Orlando have a much better parking lot to park area ratio (though still fuck em for the animal abuse)

    • hobovision@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      The yellow line in the meme is selecting quite a bit of area that isn’t SeaWorld parking, and it’s quite old too. On right it’s selecting some park area and the lot for a boat launch. On the left there is admin buildings and a Marina + parking for that. Check the satellite view.

      • Rinzler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not that it matters too much to the point they are trying to make, but they didn’t highlight the entire orca area either. So an over representation for the parking lot and under for the actual exhibit surface area.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Here’s something I don’t understand about these county-devouring parking lots: why are they all one level? Is it more than twice as expensive to build and maintain even a two-level parking structure and save half the footprint?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      One thing America has in abundance is land.

      The other thing is greed.

      So if you’re ever asking " is this option really cheaper?" The answer is that they went with the cheap option.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It is more expensive to build multilevel parking but its how the laws work. It might even be that the law required this much parking based on statistical models, which is insane if people are getting there some other way.

      Imo we could reduce the size of parking lots by just requiring nearby businesses to allow unrestricted parking during their off hours.

    • Rinzler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, a lot of the time it is, depending on land acquisition cost. Plus you then have some amount of additional ongoing maintenance cost for the structure which is also more than just that of a surface lot.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cars constantly emit toxic fumes whenever they’re running. If you try to enclose a parking lot you need some extremely expensive and power-intensive ventilation. Maybe that’ll change as electric cars become more common.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    Its actually worse than you think. The city of san diego owns sea world’s parking lot because of the original contract. The city sets the base price, and then the corp effectively doubles it cuz ofc they do. That’s also why the parking lot is allowed to be so large but the park itself never expands. The city will pretty much always let sea world lease the land for cheap knowing they ultimately get to fix what their guaranteed returns would be. Corporate greed is extremely strong with combined with local government.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just another little reminder that if there is a God somewhere out there, they’re certainly not just.

    And why I root for the orca when they sink people’s boats.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    When I went to Disney World in Japan, there was a train stop that leads right to it. That’s the way to handle it (not drive to a pointless monorail)

  • glibg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know what this thumbnail is but I won’t view it at 100% because it makes me depressed. Why are humans like this.

    • pdqcp@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sorry, I thought it fit the theme quite clearly as it shows how a car centric infrastructure hurts us all, including animals. That huge parking lot could have been housing, or a park, or perhaps a big ass tub for them to swim in. (ps: I’m not saying they should be locked up in the first place, as the sea is right over there where they could roam freely though)

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Motorism might be one of the worst things we do to ourselves, but it’s far from the worst thing we do to others. This feels like pointing out how many parking spaces it takes to operate a concentration camp.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Motorism

          You really only need to say cars, the same issue doesn’t apply to motorcycles, ebikes, buses, or trains.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And what point do YOU think that would be making? Because it just tells me you’re STILL missing the point. Zero parking lots wouldn’t make this image reflect any better. The parking lot in this image is a rhetorical device, and treating it like the point of the message intentionally ignores the actual point being made.