cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/43392244

Feb. 18, 2026

Barak Ravid reported for Axios on Wednesday that, with a deal between the US and Iran appearing increasingly out of sight, “the Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize” and “It could begin very soon.”

Sources told the outlet that “A US military operation in Iran would likely be a massive, weeks-long campaign that would look more like full-fledged war than last month’s pinpoint operation in Venezuela.”

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    There will be no pushback from war, there’s never been a war Democrats weren’t frothing at the mouth to get into

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      12 days ago

      War means more defense contracts, more defense contracts means more defense contracts in their districts. Which means more jobs, and that looks good at re-election time.

      If the world were a game of Civ 6, the US would be full bore in to the domination victory condition. We never left the wartime economy and we don’t know how to.

      We fucked.

  • Master167@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Well, those in power to check the executive branch want more distractions from the Trump Epstein file. As more of them are released, more of the public know how one sided the two party system really is. Trump gets the added excuse to restrict elections since “we’re at war”

  • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    Never been a war that hasn’t been supported by all sides of the US Gov. Too much of the economy is based around war for that. That’s why they have to keep invading places.

  • join@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    US == two imperialist parties + imperialist media + imperialist oligarchs

    Why would the US do imperialism???

    Also good question: why are all countries on the US not-nice list so concerned with attaining nukes and not being surrounded by US allies?

    It must surely be because they are evil autocracies that hate democracy and human rights (unlike the US which loves both of those things, and would never ever infringe on human rights on an industrial scale, if a (democratically elected or not) government nationalized key resources)

    (Sorry I‘m quite frustrated at the prospect of another useless war, and having to eat all the bullshit propaganda that is going to be produced in support of it, while at the same time seeing daily images of indescribable human misery.)

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Dems have decided to just allow Trump to destroy himself.
    Too bad he takes the country with him.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    weeks-long campaign

    “Mission Accomplished!” in just a few weeks, bro! And, you know, about 10-20 years of wasting time and resources, gradually building hatred towards themselves via a non-stop guerilla war and war crimes, until the US once again quietly chickens out and goes home.

    But I guess you’ve got to keep the industrial war machine happy, otherwise all the shareholders, and the economy in general, will be really upset.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Ha, where’s the real pushback on anything the obese child rapist has done?

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Obviously this sucks. Watching all these nation states leveraging the Internet to sow chaos in the US I’ve often wondered - do these motherfuckers ever think about this shit going sideways? But no, it’s always “chaos = good for us”

    Well, this is looking pretty sideways. As always the vast majority of the real, actual people on both sides don’t want this, don’t want war - don’t want this timeline at all.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    You know sadly like you already see in response here many on the left have already bought the MSM hasbara hook, line & sinker. Let’s not forget how many acquisitions we saw of major media networks recently by major IDF donor Larry Ellison & other Zionists. Netanyahu was bragging about being able to control the information war as a result. The sad truth is people are just so easy to manipulate & they have such a big desire to follow whatever they perceive as the mainstream narrative. Like if the news is pushing some dumb Hollywood sequel they in unison all start talking about it & their entire identity revolves around fads.

    Just as they voted for & was complicit in genocide, and then complain non-stop about ICE killing a very small fraction of people compared to the IDF, they will do the same with war. When it is time for elections they’ll virtue signal & pretend they were against the disaster they actively enabled or that they’re the perpetual victim for potentially ever having to deal with any repercussions of their actions.