Me: Cars

    • LouNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      The only correct answer in this thread.

      It’s the biggest industry in the world by a very large margin and the most destructive one on a global scale.

      • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Even advertising isn’t necessarily bad, having people telling you about things you might like used to be a good thing.

        I personally think it’s people like Edward Bernays who had the idea of, I guess, ‘Malicious Advertising’. They really solidified the idea of applying propaganda techniques to advertising strategies and that just kind of become expected and the norm.

        • eightpix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          More people need to know about Bernays. Literally wrote the book, Propaganda in 1928. Went on to found the industry of Public Relations. He is the reason advertisers target your subconscious, make you feel bad, an use their products as a salve for the pain they inflict.

          Adam Curtis covers the effects well in The Century of the Self. Watch out, it clocks in at just under 4 hours.

    • PHLAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Some level of advertising is surely okay, right?

      If I open a bakery and put a sign out front that says “Baked good for sale!” I don’t think anyone would complain but that IS advertising.

      This begs the question: What level of advertising is okay?

  • YaksPT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Religion. So many of today’s issues stem from the magical thinking inherent in religion.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m in mixed mind about them because you’re right, they’re too destructive, but for the time being their existence has prevented conflicts from breaking out, and since wars are typically only waged with the promise of financing it afterwards via looting or expansion, nobody is really willing to render land unusable in the process of conquering it.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          That comment is the first time you’ve considered MAD? I mean, congrats on being one of today’s lucky 10,000, but I’m surprised you didn’t learn about it in school.

          • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            When it’s presented in school, it is presented as thing of the past and localised to how Russia and America treated/still treat one another, rather than threading the needle by explaining that it still applies today. I’m pretty sure I only picked up on it after reading online explanations/justifications of nukes.

            Or in other words people focus on the panic of it so much that they don’t stop to think of it as a good thing

            TBF I think even without Nukes we wouldn’t have war between big countries. Because the UN would discourage it. Ukraine being a big exception to that

      • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Except the part where we have exhaustive evidence that nukes do not always render land unusable.

        Nagasaki and Hiroshima are entirely fine. The radiation levels were back at safe levels in days. Yes, we definitely fucked up a lot of land with nuclear testing and power plant overloads, but the actual nukes humans have dropped on other humans? They’re most effective when used in an air burst, and they clear up within days.

        The power generation and medical applications of nuclear science cannot be overlooked based on warmongering, especially when the part youre concerned about isnt even an issue in that application of the field.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    So far crypto currencies. So far they seem to expend a huge amount of electricity and used mostly for speculation.

    • The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Never actually did anything and never actually claimed to. Most people assumed it was a headache relief but the company never said that. They just said to put the shit on your forehead

  • moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    24 hour news networks.

    News used to just be the news when there was a half hour of local, half hour of national twice per night with a morning show for fluff, weather, and brief news updates. 24 hour news needed to fill the whole 24 hours and also pay for itself by getting eyeballs on advertisers. That’s when all of the sensationalist stuff started taking over.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Disposable vapes come to mind, although the real answer is probably some extremely depraved torture device.