• DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Gatekeepers are the fucking worst. Every time I start reading up on something there’s always a handful of miserable condescending shitheads being nasty to people because they’re 'not ‘doing it right.’

    Most vegan threads I come across usually has some of these, insulting anyone that’s not 100% on board even if they’re trying to get into it. Audiophiles are pretty much on the same level as hardcore vegans when it comes to being obnoxious (recently saw someone ask why the op was bothering setting up a music system if they didn’t have thousands of dollars to spare, for example). Linux users on support threads is a coin flip of whether they’ll be helpful or insulting.

    Let people ease into things, stop demanding perfection right out of the gates!

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      I think that knowing the definition of veganism is the bare minimum. Gatekeeping is one thing, but you should at least know what the thing you’re trying to join is. If you’ve done zero research, that’s on you.

      • slappyfuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        What I would say to folks is that they should do whatever they want. If they want to eat a 99% plant based diet, then they should do that.

        It’s not gatekeeping to say that you aren’t vegan if you eat bacon, but at the same time, veganism is more about ideology than diet.

      • wabasso@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        I think I understand the complaint. It’s shitty when a word with a clear definition gets literally co-opted by the masses. Then you have to go find a new word for something that was already solved.

        That being said, I’d rather we dilute the term vegan if it means getting more people to eat less meat. You can invent new words faster than you can convert people.

      • DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The problem is when said research runs you straight to a bunch of nasty people over and over. Really dampens enthusiasm when trying to get into something. Veganism is not something I personally want to get into (I’m not opposed, I just read threads to get other perspectives on things in general), but I observe the same behaviour in vegan threads as I do in other communities with die-hard enthusiasts for things that I am into. The same behaviour is also in Linux communities which makes me hesitate to recommend it to people, because it has a toxic shithead problem.

        Kinda like when you look up a problem and the first thing you run into is a guy telling the op that they’re a moron and to just google it

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          You don’t do research into anything by asking random scrubs on the Internet.

          Read a book, read a book, read a motherfucking book.

    • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      24 days ago

      Why is it that when libs talk about “imperfection” it seemingly is about mass murder? This is how they tried to sell genocide joe, then bomber harris, and now this treatbrained bullshit.

      • DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s quite an escalation, and you demonstrated my point excellently. You’re not gonna bring more people to your point of view by being nasty, you’re only driving them away.