NVIDIA has announced that starting January 1, 2026, each GeForce NOW cloud gaming subscription will be limited to 100 hours of play time per month. The company is implementing its long-lasting promise revealed in 2024, with the option for users to purchase additional play time as needed. Under the standard Performance tier, which costs $9.99 per month, after the 100-hour play time is reached, users can buy extra 15-hour blocks for $2.99 each. For the Ultimate tier, priced at $19.99 per month, additional 15-hour blocks are available for $5.99 each.

Since months are averaged to about 30.437 days, any play time exceeding the 100-hour limit is rounded up to the next 15-hour block, potentially leading to extra charge if someone wants more play time. For instance, playing around three hours per day (approximately 91 hours per month) remains within the base fee, but playing four hours daily (about 122 hours per month) results in extra costs of approximately $15.97 on the Performance tier or $31.97 on the Ultimate tier.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yup, and you won’t be able to build your own PC because the same assholes pulling this shit are sucking up all the hardware resources for “AI”

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    You’re a fucking moron if you buy Nvidia at this point and you deserve everything you lose because of it.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    i am the ideal customer for this type of service. i don’t have a gaming computer, and I don’t want to own a gaming computer, but I want to dip into new titles as they come out and indulge once in a while.

    i tried geforce now and the waiting rooms and the time caps make it unusable to me. i am paying for convenience here, and yet I can’t play when I want to play, and I get kicked if i play for too long or if I make a coffee. and then I wait again. im paying money to wait in a line on the internet.

    im trying to sneak video games into the small amount of time that I have, and it’s not letting me do that. there’s actually no ideal customer for this service. it’s a product that doesn’t make any sense. they can suck my balls with this shit

      • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Also the sleep function on Steam Deck is pretty good. I bring mine to work and grab some offline playtime during my 15 minute breaks, and sometimes during my 30 min lunch after i eat. No Man’s Sky is chill and easy to pickup/putdown, Minecraft as well. I’m sure other titles would work as well.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Also seconding. I don’t have kids but I play dad game hours: I’ve been playing hollowknight a few hours a week for about 6 months. Did the same with Celeste, Quake 1, FF1–6

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Aren’t the waiting rooms mainly for the non-paying customers? I thought as soon as you subscribe, you jump way ahead of most other users.

      Surprisingly, if they have such waiting times, it seems to indicate they do have people using the service.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Surprisingly, if they have such waiting times, it seems to indicate they do have people using the service.

        If there are waiting times on a regular basis, it mostly says they under-bought hardware to service what customers they have. Which comes at the cost of future customers as people hate lines.

        But, yeah, I think GeForce Now is the only cloud gaming service that didn’t flop instantly. Though, with the prices listed in OP’s article, the value proposition just seems really bad. They may be killing what audience they have.

        • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well you forget that the purpose of a subscription is just to take even more money regularly. It was never about providing a service. The fact that they’re limiting playtime shows they have insufficient hardware and have no intentions of correcting the issue. The answer is to just charge more money for the same flawed “service. “

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The last time I tried it was around the skylines 2 launch and I paid for the premium whatever thing and I definitely waited a lot

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    243
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The goal is to get you to rent your computer forever.

    AI, vast datacenters, hardware “shortages”, cloud services, DRM, TPM… it’s all part of the same pipeline: remove compute power from the user and concentrate it under control of the manufacturers in order to lease it back to the public in tightly controlled environments.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    5 days ago

    Rent your shit, and be a slave of price changes.

    When you agree to a subscription, you are enrolling to get fuck, sooner or later.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is ultimately just punching sideways and down though.

      These companies will win when your strategy is to simply shit on other people for existing.

      You may not think that is what you’re doing but it is. How so? Because while you care about this area of life enough to get into the details, for other people, their areas of care are completely different, and it is unreasonable for you to expect everyone to care about precisely what you care about.

      As such, punching down and sideways only serves the purpose of making an environment where only the rich and powerful band together, and the poor (us) routinely infight and chop off our own legs rather than realizing that these megacorps hiring leagues of lobbyists, psychologists, marketers, etc know exactly how to push, and know that exactly the person you are bitching at will almost certainly never see your comment, or will consider it hostile and irrelevant so it wont matter either way.

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        What in the literal fuck are you on about. You are worried someone is going to take this comment personally, get hurt, and then run to their corporate overlords!?

        That bitching about subscriptions is actually an attack on those who use the service and not a word to the wise that enshitification is coming for all your subscriptions.

        I think you are taking this in perhaps the most bizarre way possible.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          What in the literal fuck are you on about. You are worried someone is going to take this comment personally, get hurt, and then run to their corporate overlo

          No. What the fuck are you on about.

          Your malicious read of my pretty clear comment is so obviously absurd its like Im talking to a rage bait ai bot…

          Their comment placed blame on people for simply existing in a world that is increasingly enshitified by subscriptions and my comment clearly was aimed at reaiming that blame at who deserves it rather than fighting people in the same class as you.

          I think you are taking this in perhaps the most bizarre way possible.

          Says the person doing mental gymnastics to read the comment in a nonsensical way so they can be toxic about it.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            You personalized this beyond all reason. There was no malicious reading just someone trying to understand what you where trying to say.

            Apparently, I was dead on. You are trying to say someone that is commenting your subscriptions are going to get enshitified is somehow a personal attack rather than a statement of fact.

            Clearly you are some kind of person who acts like an extremely sensitive bootlicker rather than a rational actor who is here to discuss. I would not suggest taking it personally or acting like a bootlicker in the future if you can avoid it.

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You personalized this beyond all reason. There was no malicious reading just someone trying to understand what you where trying to say.

              Oh right, thats where the “You are worried someone is going to take this comment personally, get hurt, and then run to their corporate overlords” comes from. From you not being malicious at all.

              Apparently, I was dead on

              You are obviously a troll at this point. Obviously being completely wrong in every conceivable way confirms you were actually right…

              Calling someone a bootlicker for telling people that solidarity is better than inner class fighting is so absurd you being a troll is the only logical conclusion.

              Given you have another comment that goes like this::

              I made statements, you can choose to do whatever you want with them. Trying to simplify this into good and bad is definitely a failing on your part.

              I have spent decades studying this stuff so my perspective will be informed and wildly different than yours. That is okay.

              I was raised Republican, became a Democrat, and now I vote Independent based on policy not feelings. I am very aware how all sides think.

              I think its pretty much confirmed you are indeed a troll.

              vote Independent based on policy not feelings.

              Lol

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                You offered no solidarity, give me a break. You were dissing on a word to the wise under the assumption it was a personal attack due to your poor streaming choices. You are just overreacting at this point and likely every point.

                Why you flail about with wild accusations is beyond me. It is probably because I am dead right that you are acting like a little bootlicker corporate clown. Solidarity, lol.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    HA!

    Oh look a pricey solution to an issue they made, who would have seen it coming?

  • Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 days ago

    Capitalism will find ways to create capital, usually ending in rents. Neither free markets nor regulated can solve this as it is rooted in a contradiction.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Capitalism has carcinisation for rent. If something stay solvent long enough, it will turn into a rent seeking subscription.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh dear… I was in hospital a few weeks ago and I’ve been recovering at home. In the last two weeks I’ve manly played three games: 64 hours in the first, 50 hours in the second, and 10 hours in the third (that one was all in one day)

      I’d never use a thing like GeForce Now either way, but I’d be boned hahaha

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        How good is hospital recovery?

        Sure, there’s some cons, but you basically get a free card to game relentlessly, undisturbed, and guilt-free. Tragically, you eventually heal up and have to go back to being a normie.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          Oh my gawd it’s best thing. Hospital was insane but very interesting and by the time I got home I was feeling pretty awesome… my boss told me to not think about work and that he set me up for a leave of absence I still get paid for with HR. I’m treasuring every day.

    • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah that was basically my thought too. I probably do less than a quarter of that on average, but that’s not really the point. I should be allowed as much time as I want. Not that I use a Nvidia subscription anyway, but still. This makes me mad on behalf of other people.

    • milk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can’t imagine this will make Nvidia much money at all. The vast, vast majority of people aren’t playing more than 100 hours of videogames a month but having a tagline that you can play as much as you want is a very attractive offer to a consumer, at least to me.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    Aren’t they making a shitton of money? They can’t even use the usual enshittification excuses, this is just being greedy dicks.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 days ago

      The excuse is, and has always been, “Because we can”. Never think otherwise.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      Gamer Nexus said it best pointing it out that the tech bros want to do to computers what private equity did to the housing market of turning everything into subscriptions.

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      They can’t even use the usual enshittification excuses, this is just being greedy dicks.

      The usual enshitification excuses are companies just being greedy dicks, and more than anything, a lack of regulation enforcement existing to stop companies simply outspending other companies out of business.

  • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    saw this coming the second I heard about GeForce cloud gaming…never in a million years will I subscribe to play games. wow was the only exception to that rule previously, but now I just run my own server locally so even that, never again

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can’t recall why, but I was tired of 3DFX. I think they had a monopoly on 3D acceleration or something, and at the time OpenGL seemed like the way to go. An unknown company called Nvidia released a card called the Riva TNT and it contributed to OpenGL becoming widely supported as well as ending 3DFX’s once deserved dominance.

    Nvidia kept hitting it out of the park, creating iterations of cards that made it worthwhile to upgrade every several years. I think the competition from ATI (now AMD) may have kept them from falling into the same rut as 3DFX, and as gamers we’ve enjoyed the result of that relationship with good cards from both.

    Today…Nvidia has grown into something that had shed its reason for being. It’s crazy to see their logo in business news top stories. What they’re doing, contributing to a tech development that is so far out front of government oversight that could protect people from the consequences, I see them more as a threat to society than anything else. It’s crazy.