• @AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    I use Firefox. If I’m on the web and a site does not work with Firefox, I leave that site.

    Do they think somehow people like me will change our minds? And more to the point, do they think website authors will want to limit their own audience for the benefit of some company?

    Unless I’m misunderstanding this, maybe I need an ELI5

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People like you and me are unfortunately a small minority. Most people go along with it, so they set about steamrolling over us through coercion or just not doing business with us

    • @abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Apple sold this feature as an alternative to captchas.

      In order to sign up for Lemmy, I had to pass a captcha check to prove I’m human. Now that bots can trivially be better than any human at captchas we have to find something else. Is attestation a good option? We can debate that, but it’s definitely on the table. And I expect Firefox will implement it (even if only via a plugin) if it becomes widely adopted.

  • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Is there a way to address the problems outlined by the proponents of these technologies without placing too much power in anti-democratic and anti-user organizations like Apple and Google?