Sure, we have open source, federated replacements for Instagram, Tiktok, and YouTube. How do we get creators to use this stuff? One consideration involves the ability to pay for things.

I’ve been thinking a lot recently about PeerTube, Loops, Bandwagon, and other platforms in the Fediverse that are geared around artists. I might get flamed for this, and you’re welcome to disagree, but I think the network is in dire need of having support for commerce.

Not “Big Capitalism” commerce, but the ability for people to buy and sell things, support projects, and commission their favorite creators to keep making more stuff.

  • EfreetSK@lemmy.worldEnglish
    51·
    2 months ago

    Maybe it’s just nostalgia but in my opinion, with youtube it went all to shit the moment the money started to be involved. Algorithm chasing, advertisement, reactive content, sponsors, quickly generated videos, … and all the other shit.

    So if monetization, then let’s try to avoid same mistakes

    • ikt@aussie.zoneEnglish
      4·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think it was money that changed youtube, i think it was the algo, it now promotes viral content that for some reason has a persons face in the thumbnail with an exaggerated face :O

      • Sean Tilley@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
        3·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the YouTube algorithm itself is a huge problem. I think about the fact that there are entire slop studios out there trying to ride algorithm trends, churning out crap to push onto YouTube Kids so that they’ll do numbers and make a lot of money from it.

        Like, I have nothing against the concept of a recommendation algorithm itself, but the relationship I just described is nightmare fuel.