London’s Metropolitan Police arrested another 492 people over the weekend after a protest Saturday in Trafalgar Square, as the Starmer government accelerated its crackdown on opposition to the Gaza genocide.

The entirely peaceful protest was held to oppose the proscription of Palestine Action. It was organised by Defend Our Juries and attended by over 1,000 people. Of the arrests, 488 were for holding up signs declaring, “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action”.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is so self defeating… Palestine Action should have never been declared a “terrorist organization” in the same category as Al Qaeda and Daesh. People see right through that and it causes a backlash. Nd the UK government doubling down on the backlash creates even more backlash. I mean anyone can see that at this point that the government has lost the political battle on this one and is just chugging through due to the sunk cost fallacy. This is only paving the way for the Right to do a comeback. Fucking centrist liberals man, god damn.

  • RandomlyGeneratedName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 hours ago

    In the end, the problem stems from billionaires. They created the right wing propaganda machine that caused this far right authoritarian rise. They did it recklessly only to increase their own power. Billionaires can no longer exist. Capitalism is failing. We need a new path forward.

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    That’s a funny looking labour government you got there UK.

    How did you guys go from Corbyn to this? Is it so hard to have a labour party leader that doesn’t back Israel or Russia?

    • Small_Quasar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Starmer is terrified of Reform. So he’s taken the really smart stance of pulling Labour to the right to court a demographic that would never vote Labour anyway, and in the meantime utterly piss off his core base.

      • Avicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This almost always fails and only ends up moving the country average to right and make extreme right seem more mild.

        Also I don’t think right wing voters have that strong an opinion on Israel. This is more likely zionist lobbies pulling some of Starmer’s strings.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Folks who get really up in their feelings about the Trump/Harris election seem to forget that Harris was taking campaign advice from this guy. It’s so easy to forget how absolutely poisoned so-called “Liberal Democracy” has become with a broad strain of fascist tendency.

      On the one hand, you’ve got a guy who is looking to literally lay siege to cities in the US that didn’t vote for him. On the opposite side of the pond, they’re doing mass-arrests of anyone with a “Please Stop Killing Brown People” bumper sticker. And in the middle, a sea of smug dipshits posting “You got what you voted for”.

      • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Liberals will ALWAYS end up siding with the Fascists to try to suppress the Left. Happened in Germany in the 1930s, and the dumbass liberals eventually ended up lined up against the same walls the communists and socialists were lined up against. If you’re a liberal today and defending this fascist suppression against Palestine Action: you’re next.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Happened in Germany in the 1930s

          Happened in the 1910s, even. Hence the old quip about Bernie Sanders killing Rosa Luxemburg.

          dumbass liberals eventually ended up lined up against the same walls the communists and socialists were lined up against

          Or marched out into the snows of Russia to seize more Lebensraum for the imperial core. Or just bombed to death in Dresden or Berlin when the front lines collapsed.

          If you’re a liberal today and defending this fascist suppression against Palestine Action: you’re next.

          The hard math of living in a fascist state is standing up and getting shot today or ducking and hiding in hopes you won’t get shot tomorrow.

          Liberals made their bed back in 2009. We’re all just living in the aftermath.

        • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’d argue that the Liberals are a little farther down the line. This administration isn’t finished bullying women, intellectuals, non-Caucasians and the queer community to death, they’re just getting started.

      • yucandu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What about the other 160 or so democracies? How they doin?

        Especially the proportional representation ones. FPTP is just a hint of democracy.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          What about the other 160 or so democracies?

          I’m not sure where you’re getting your numbers, but…

          In 2024, just 6.6% of the world population lived in “full democracies”, falling from 12.5% a decade ago. Overall, the vast majority of these countries are in Europe, with notable exceptions—such as Japan, Mauritius, and Costa Rica—across other global regions.

          I’m counting far less than 160.

          FPTP is just a hint of democracy.

          Sure. But then IRV still gave us NYC Eric Adams as mayor of New York. There’s more to democracy than the shape of your ballot.

          • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Calling Japan a full democracy is a stretch. They’ve been ruled by one party for over half a century, and definitely not b/c they’re good at their jobs.

          • yucandu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            In 2024, just 6.6% of the world population lived in “full democracies”,

            I’m counting far less than 160.

            Sorry I didn’t make any claims as to what constitutes a “full” democracy, I was going with these guys who put it at about 167 “democracies”.

            Sure. But then IRV still gave us

            IRV is just FPTP+. Like you say, it isn’t an electoral system so much as a ballot system.

            We studied it, in Canada, under the name “Alternative Vote”. It was the only one we could find that was worse than FPTP:

            https://www.ourcommons.ca/content/Committee/421/ERRE/Reports/RP8655791/errerp03/06-RPT-Chap4-e_files/image002.gif

            There’s a reason why politicians keep suggesting it, and it’s not for our benefit.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Sorry I didn’t make any claims as to what constitutes a “full” democracy

              I’d settle for what defines “democracy” at all. I’ve seen folks claim El Salvador is a democracy while Nicaragua isn’t, entirely because the government of El Salvador is politically aligned with the US and the Nicaraguans are not.

              IRV is just FPTP+

              I don’t really care what flavor of election system you think is the right one. However you square it, you can have shit candidates win popular mandates. There is no system that’ll keep people you don’t like out of office, shy of a dictatorship that puts you in charge.

              There’s a reason why politicians keep suggesting it

              Suggesting it? Thirteen states have now banned ranked-choice voting as municipalities decide on whether to adopt it

              • yucandu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I don’t really care what flavor of election system you think is the right one.

                You’re against logic and reason?

                However you square it, you can have shit candidates win popular mandates. There is no system that’ll keep people you don’t like out of office, shy of a dictatorship that puts you in charge.

                I’m not interested in a system that will keep people I don’t like out of office. I’m interested in a system that represents the will of the people, rather than the will of a select rich and powerful few.

                If you’re willing to care, you might find one.

                Suggesting it? Thirteen states have now banned ranked-choice voting as municipalities decide on whether to adopt it

                I don’t see the problem here, like I said, it’s worse than FPTP.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Spraying military aircraft with red paint isn’t terrorism by any stretch of the imagination. Who does it terrorize? And supporting an organisation whose members sprayed fighter jets with paint isn’t terrorism either. There’s no justification for the UK government’s use of anti-terrorist legislation against these protesters.

      By contrast, supporting a regime that has been openly committing genocide for years and uses torture and murder to intimidate its opponents could well qualify as terrorism.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        And runs political interference campaigns at the highest levels of its allies to gain unlimited support. We label other countries foreign actors waging hybrid warfare for a lot less. It’s crazy.

    • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      So? I support Palestine Action and all actions they’ve taken to stop the UK’s complicity in genocide. It’s illegal to say this in the UK.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      When Keir Starmer was a solicitor he defended people, successfully, for the same kind of thing. This isn’t terrorism, this is my government taking away our rights to protest.

      People are ignoring their proscription to bring attention to the insanity of it and hope to force the government to back down. It’s mainly old people being arrested; including priests. I would do it myself but it’s hard when you’ve got work and being in jail would hinder that.

      For what it’s worth I support Palestine Action.