• @Mateoto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1082 years ago

    We are over the edge of no return.

    We should stop begging for change and act now. Politics must hurt them with reforms, taxes, and the rule of law.

    We cannot stop climate change now, but we can try to de-accelerate by fighting against big oil, corrupt politics, and billionaire newspapers supporting them.

    • @masquenox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      Politics must hurt them with reforms, taxes, and the rule of law.

      Yeah… that’s how we ended up in this situation. How do you think these giant corporations became so powerful? They “reformed” laws until they could do whatever the hell they please - that’s what “reform” gets you.

    • @Licherally@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Politicians love their bribes more than they love the planet, so that’s probably not going to happen. Dems and cons both

    • @Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Ya right. When has prices went over 5 dollars a gallon in the US, people there list their minds. God forbid we should drive a bit less or consume less.

      This is a consumer problem not big oil. The second biggest company in the world by revenue and by far the largest by profit is Saudi Aramco. And why are they so big and countries like Russia are energy giants? Because we are tax and regulated our oil companies significantly more while increasing our consumption. Instead of buying locally, we are now buying from countries like Russia and Saudia Arabia. Look how that is working out.

    • albigu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Malcolm X has an old speech which applies very well to this issue as well. Too bad you can’t vote for him anymore.

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Too many people believe they can just continue living like they were 30 years ago - if big oil would stop producing stuff and plastics, gas and airplane fuels would not be available anymore then people would riot

      Even threatening to increase prices to a level that would make sense to limit the use to absolutely necessary levels would piss off too many people to be a viable option because everyone just wants to believe that it’s just for “the others” to change but not for themselves.

      Everyone has to act and change their Livestyle…

      • DreamerOfImprobableDreams
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        This is the truth right there. Gas prices went up two measly dollars compared to normal in 2022, and everyone flipped the fuck out. People were prepared to elect Republicans-- fucking Republicans- to office, they were so furious about it.

        And don’t @ me about “100 corporations are responsible for like 90% of emissions”. Who’s buying those corporations’ goods? Who’s refusing to vote for politicians that’ll meaningfully regulate these corporations? Who’s spending all day fantasizing about Da Revolushun^TM that’ll never fucking come (and would kill tens of millions of civilians and likely result in fascists winning and seizing control of your country, if not the whole thing splintering into a bunch of warring fiefdoms controlled by ruthless oligarchs) instead of getting to actual work trying to effect real change in the real world? And I don’t mean “direct action” (read: looking edgy and getting photos for the 'gram), I mean actually fucking getting policy passed that’ll have a real impact on people’s real lives.

            • Aesthesiaphilia
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              Seems odd to say

              And don’t @ me about “100 corporations are responsible for like 90% of emissions”. Who’s buying those corporations’ goods?

              People bringing up the 100 corporations are usually calling for regulations on them, and the “you’re the ones buying the goods” people are usually calling for Personal Responsibility and Voting With Your Wallet.

              • @1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 years ago

                It’s possible to both think those companies should be regulated and that people are doing almost nothing personally to help, including electing people to enact those policies. For most people I talk to the “but 100 corps” is a total deflection of personal responsibility. This crisis will not be solved without a good heaping helping of both personal responsibility and aggressive government regulation. If nothing else because that aggressive regulation will never pass into law unless people acknowledge their personal responsibility and are willing to accept the sacrifices that will come with it.

                • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -12 years ago

                  In the US, unless you are willing to vote third party, you don’t get the choice to vote for Anti-Capitalist politicians. And there are millions of liberals waiting in line to scold you for not voting for the parties of Capital.

      • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What a vague and silly comment, half the world’s top contributors to greenhouse gasses aren’t even capitalist countries. I get the fediverse isn’t a fan of capitalism, but you can’t just blanketly blame everything on it.

        • @masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 years ago

          The US military is the single largest polluter organisation on the planet - do tell me how we can’t blame capitalism again?

          And just for your information - that other gigantic capitalist country you falsely believe isn’t capitalist? Guess what? It’s capitalist.

          • @Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -20
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            China is the number one greenhouse gas contributor, Russia is near the top of the list as well. Fuck off tankies.

            • albigu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              92 years ago

              The United States has double China’s emissions per capita, and China actually is the world leader in the production of sustainable development products like solar panels even though the USA had a 150 year head start in its industrialisation. Despite whatever criticisms you may have against China, looking only at total emissions is definitely misleading. China’s renewable power has gone up fivefold in the past 15 years in absolute numbers and double in percentage of total production. The USA hasn’t even been building hydro dams since the 80s, while China has built some 15 in the past 20 years. Since one is explicitly the most capitalist country and the other is “”“capitalist actually”“”, I think it is fair to say that capitalism has a negative correlation with fighting climate change.

              Though I have no idea why you included the Russian Federation there, since it is a capitalist oligarchy created by and modelled after the USA. Do you believe that Russia is communist by any chance?

            • @masquenox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              China is the number one

              Sooo… a capitalist state?

              Russia is near the top

              Sooo… another capitalist state?

              Fuck off tankies.

              You don’t know what a tankie is, do you?

              I knew it was a bad day when we allowed liberals access to that word.

                • @masquenox@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  You walked blindly into this argument with absolutely zero understanding of the subject matter at hand, didn’t you?

                • ghost_laptop
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -12 years ago

                  Do you think a tankie would say China is a capitalist nation? Liberalism really is worse than brain cancer. They are either an anarchist or some other shit, you just see the names of the enemies of the empire and scream, you poor ignorant Gringo.

            • Solar Bear
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I just wanna know what exactly you think a tankie is

  • @masquenox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 years ago

    Oh, the capitalists didn’t do what their public relations exercises pretended they were going to do? Golly gee… no one could have seen that coming at all.

  • @DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    These companies will not change unless they are forced to do so and our government isn’t going to do shit since most of congress is in the pocket of big oil. So what are our other options?

    Everyone likes to blame individuals for not using renewables or buying an electric car, when it reality their options were limited in the first place by big oil. Most people can barely afford to put food on the table and green or renewable products are usually significantly more expensive and not really an option. Besides that, IIRC ordinary citizens only account for roughly 20% of all greenhouse gas emissions. So the onus lies on big oil to make changes and offer affordable renewable options instead of the same gas guzzling/polluting bullshit we’ve been offered up to this point. But like I said, they won’t do something like that unless they are forced to do so, they will always pursue profit over people, unless those people get in their faces and force them to pursue other options.

    • @reverendz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      It’s time for radical action and violent resistance.

      We’re staring into the face of human extinction and people are still quibbling about consumer choice.

      it’s going to take much, much more direct and violent action to force change.

    • @Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      If current green companies can’t make affordable options, why in God’s earth would you think it would be cheaper if conventional energy companies join the mix?

      Your entire statement is conflicting. Angry about high costs being unaffordable then suggesting oil companies to not produce low cost energy that keeps prices down while acknowledging the high cost of green energy.

  • @pepperonisalami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    I have low expectation but damn…didn’t think that they’d be that low.

    We all are trying to do our parts you know, I used to like cars when I was in HS, now I don’t even consider having one. I’ll stick to public transport and will get an electric last mile transport.

    These people sucks ass. They have the monetary power to make real change but decided to double down. Nowadays investments in renewables have good returns and will be viable for the next couple decades, but they care too much for their previously invested monies and want to milk the people to the last drop.