• simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m for blocking Threads. I’m not for blocking instances that support Threads. That’s ridiculous, you’d just split the community and make the Fediverse irrelevant.

  • RxBrad@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    And this is how you gut the Fediverse… Don’t even give people the option to run their own single-user instance to avoid the drama. Defederate them, too. Splinter everything into oblivion.

    EDIT: Seriously. As someone who isn’t a hardcore militant FOSS federation activist, this is the kind of stuff that makes me want to throw up my hands and say, “Screw it. I guess I’ll go sign up at Threads.”

    • lattenwald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I would agree with you if threads didn’t choose to avoid market with decent consumer protection laws, EU.

      They aren’t launching at EU for a reason, and that’s good enough for me to take a stance against them.

      • SUPERcrazy3530@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Just because they haven’t launched in the EU yet doesn’t mean they won’t. They were clearly rushing to get this out the door. I’d be absolutely shocked if they don’t go to the EU since Facebook and Instagram are there already.

        • Kinga@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Facebook is in a lot of shit with EU right now because of GDPR non compliance. They are at a risk of just getting flat out booted from here if they don’t fix their shit.

          That combined with the upcoming Digital Markets Act means they might not get a chance to launch here at all

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Won’t they have to comply with at least some EU laws in order to become federated? If EU residents can interact with Threads via another instance, they’ll still be on the hook for all of that mirrored data.

    • andresil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Then go ahead to threads tbh, too many times now has some amazing things on the internet been absolutely fucking ruined by a company or by it becoming a business.

      Enough with companies being involved with everything.

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m all for blocking threads on instances, BUT

    defederating with OTHER instances just because they haven’t blocked threads is gonna create a massive split in this community, possibly could kill it. big no 👎

  • MishMash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I’m all for individual users blocking Threads if they’d like to, but I think it’s a terrible idea for instance admins to make that decision for all of their users.

    Personally, I don’t see why this is so controversial. I view it as a way to follow the celebs and organizations that would rather use threads, but from the comfort of Mastodon that is outside of Meta’s ecosystem.

    ActivityPub and the Fediverse is designed to for natural selection to take place. So let it. The users that want to be part of the Fediverse are already here and won’t don’t leave based on what Meta does with Threads. Threads utilizing ActivityPub in the future justifies the means of the Fediverse more than anything else IMO. I despise Meta as much as the next person, but this is not the end of the Fediverse as we know it.

  • SlippiHUD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m all for blocking Threads as an instance or user, but blocking instances that choose to federate with threads is going to leave a lot users who when Threads breaks its compatibility with Activity Pub with no social graph to keep them tethered to ActivityPub.

    Threads can’t get the data we’re worried about it collecting from federation, they can only get it from you installing/using their site or their app. So don’t do that.

    I think the difference between this EEE and say XMPPs EEE is Meta/facebook is widely seen as a cancerous entity that people who are already here aren’t going to want to use, and when they break compatibility few people are going to want to switch to their service as long as there’s still enough people here to talk to.

    Not to downplay the threat of EEE, we need to remain vigilant. Our best defenses are preemptive defederation or shitposting how we never see ads.

  • Aurix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    What if you are on Meta’s payroll and want to start this so the Fediverse destroys itself from within? Gotya, sucky Zucc! Nice try. /s

    For real, can’t this Meta train derail next to the Titanic already? Joining an open communication standard platform and then complain the open standard communicates with outside. I really think you have been in the wrong place from the very beginning.