Just finished the stellarbook, by James Arbib and Tony Seba (from RethinkX). They make a very interesting case on how we can move from our current extractive societies to one of abundance. It touches on many themes that are well known in the solar punk community, still it brought together a clear overview and model of where we are now and how to get to a better world.

I was wondering if anyone here has read it as well. And what your take is.

  • will
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1311 days ago

    Are there any non-Amazon purchase options?

  • @solo@slrpnk.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I was wondering if anyone here has read it as well. And what your take is.

    Personally, I will not read it because:

    Meet the authors

    James Arbib is a technology investor and the founder of Tellus Mater, an independent philanthropic foundation dedicated to exploring the impacts of disruptive technology and its potential for solving some of the world’s most challenging problems.

    Tony Seba is a world-renowned thought leader, author, speaker, educator, investor and Silicon Valley entrepreneur.

    In relation to the content of the book, I wouldn’t be too surprised if these two capitalists suggest misleading technological “solutions” to a problem that is not technological in nature, but systemic. Meaning, the problem is the eternal growth of the capitalist system on a finite planet, and there is no techno-fix for that. Also, I’m pretty sure they are making baseless claims about humans and human societies to back their proposals.

    Anyways, now that I said all that, may I suggest another reading? Totally free and priceless :)

    What is Solarpunk?

    • @Ruigaard@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Hahaha, thanks for the reading tip.

      The interesting thing in their book is, they acknowledge the end of the road for capitalism/extraction. Technologies like solar, wind, batteries (and recycling thereof) offer a great alternative with near zero marginal costs, they apply the same logic to labor in the form of robotics and AI (of AI I’m still skeptical). If these technologies will be further implemented will undermine incumbent industries. And can replace them entirely with almost free energy and labor. But they do caution that there needs to be a shift from the capitalistic outrol of this tech (as is happening now) to a communal benefit of them. As well a change of private ownership to a new communal model. The potential abundance can make this happen, starting in tech-eco hubs and spread from there. It’s definitly about a techno, system and societal “fix”.

      Honestly I get your skepticism and that of other commenters, but as someone who works (and plays) in the sustainability field for a long time now, this book made a lot of sense.

      That being said, I will keep on reading a lot of different sources on the subject as well and refine my opinion further.

      • @solo@slrpnk.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        710 days ago

        If I understand you correctly in the part you talk about labor, robotics and AI, it reminds me of what was said by capitalists when automations started being employed in factories, meaning many, many decades ago.

        At the time the capitalist narrative was saying to workers stuff like “we know you work hard, but thanks to the technological advancements in automations your children will work less and have a better life”. We very well know this never happened, only the rich got richer, to the detriment of everybody else and the planet as a whole.

        So, allow me to say, this approach is not new.

  • @Wether@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    511 days ago

    This looks like such capitalist drek. No more self-appointed ‘thought leaders’, please.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1011 days ago

        That’s no excuse, Walled Culture is available as a DRM free, gratis ebook. If they wanted to make it free, they could’ve.

        • @Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 days ago

          Wanting to live in a better society doesnt free you of the requirements of living in the current one. Insisting all writing must be freely given away is equivalent to saying only the independently wealthy get a voice.

          • JackGreenEarth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 days ago

            I’m not wealthy by any means, but I’ve made the choice I’m not going to sell information to people. If necessary I’ll sell my labour to companies, which may include creating information, but outside of a job if I create something, it’s free for anyone to use.

            People can have standards, unless they would literally die otherwise in which case do what you can to survive. But I doubt the authors of that book are in such a situation.

            • @Womble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 days ago

              That’s a an admirable stance for you to take. It’s not admirable to insist that everyone else is held to what you personally are willing to hold yourself to.

    • @Ruigaard@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 days ago

      Thanks for your cynisism, but they do have a lot of free reading as well regarding the topic at RethinkX.com. Besides, realistically book publishing isn’t free yet, so I get they use a paid channel for book readers.

      • jevans ⁂
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1311 days ago

        kinda related: I get that you gotta make money in this world, and I’m happy to pay for a book, but it always makes me so sad when authors don’t offer DRM-free eBooks, especially when the content is about ending capitalism. This is even worse because, not only do they only have a DRM-laden option, but they also only selling it on Amazon.

        It’s really frustrating how common this is.

      • Alexander
        link
        fedilink
        711 days ago

        Nah, they just do not trust me to donate if their material is good, best case scenario. I dont have enough time to read all the good stuff published by people who respect their audience to pay for this… Wait a minute, not even to them but to hardcore unethical publishing house?!