• @ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11420 days ago

    Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

    Got questions about a medication?

    Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

    AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

    • @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1520 days ago

      Browsing the internet will be like playing AI Quake II, you’ll think you are in this alternate universe.

  • Kami
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8620 days ago

    Sounds like the best thing that could happen to Firefox

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3520 days ago

      Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

      Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

      Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

    • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -320 days ago

      Firefox, the software mainly driven by Mozilla, which is heavily investing in AI and ads ventures? That Firefox?

      But, maybe “it will be different this time”, I guess.

    • @GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

      • @TON618@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        419 days ago

        I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

  • @neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2219 days ago

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It’s genius!

    • @ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      319 days ago

      Likely it’ll use the cloud for processing, you’ll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like “prompt by default” and “AI autocomplete”, which you can only “snooze” as they’ll automatically be turned back on the moment there’s a “great new feature”, like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it’s made by real artists.

  • @11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1920 days ago

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you’re paying them a titbit more than what the service they’re providing is worth.

    • MysticKetchup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4620 days ago

      I’m sure they’re less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome’s market share

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      320 days ago

      What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they’re charging. From what I read, I think they’re still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.

  • @scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1219 days ago

    When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

  • @uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1020 days ago

    This can’t happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it’s got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

  • @futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    719 days ago

    And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here’s your evidence that there’s no such thing.

  • @sucrerey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    115 days ago

    we had an intern ask AI what it could to to completely enshittify the browser. the AI simply responded, “put me in coach!”

  • @rippersnapper@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    019 days ago

    I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.