• @Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    7416 days ago

    Rule 1. When you’re having political problems at home, create a foreign enemy to distract the population.

  • brvslvrnst
    link
    fedilink
    3216 days ago

    Lol sounds like he’s doing a great job in his role checks notes in charge of US defense.

    • Dessalines
      link
      fedilink
      19
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Apparently the crucial moment for the US to attack was a few year ago, when they still had naval superiority. They missed their window luckily for us. Thanks to the PRC the US doesn’t get to use SE Asia and Europe as their cannon fodder.

    • @PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      3016 days ago

      I remember how they bragged that the operation against Yemen was the biggest naval operation since WW2.

      And they lost that, against country having no navy and no airforce.

  • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    1616 days ago

    Lots of comments that “this is a false distraction to justify war on Panama”. War on Panama is about interdicting Chinese commerce with Brazil and other countries south of US. Including FDI in Panama to boost its cross ocean trade volume through a railway.

    This is more of a classified leak exposing US weakness and impotence. This does compromise stupid people’s faith in US protections across the world, and their rulers corrupt submission to US under propaganda of US protection.

    • ☂️-
      link
      fedilink
      415 days ago

      they already forced a 100% tariff on chinese imports in brazil

      • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        115 days ago

        I’m only aware of 30% tariffs on Chinese steel in Brazil, which is same mistake any manufacturing country can make. This was under Biden. They are unpopular, and Brazil still does significant trade with China.

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          a) we are not a manufacturing country. we mostly sell raw materials to china

          b) manufactured chinese imports are taxed 100%, not raw materials. think consumer goods. we have a few exceptions, like EVs

  • @ef9357@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1415 days ago

    It’s not like China has to lift a finger, the US government is doing a fine job of destroying the country.

  • @Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -1716 days ago

    …and the US could make a China shaped nuclear crater to the west of Taiwan. Then everyone clapped.

    “Bro, what if…”

    • @MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1515 days ago

      “Well we could immediately escalate any conflict to end human civilization” is not the boast you think it is.

      Look at the current war in Ukraine – the closest we’ve come to direct conflict between two nuclear superpowers. Nukes are useful only to the extent they make the other side think twice about a large, conventional invasion. If you actually use them against someone who can retaliate, you lose.

    • @IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      615 days ago

      Could they though? You think China would just sit around and let the U.S fire nuclear missiles at them without intercepting them and firing their own? Why are you so sure that wouldn’t just end up with a U.S sized crater north of Mexico?

      Also, dismissing any predictive situation as some crazy out there “what if” is hilarious.

      War games are an extremely important part of any strategy so that you don’t just walk right into an easily predictable slaughter because you “don’t care about what ifs”.