• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    The only reasons to not switch are political: the threatened power of the fossil capitalists and the geopolitical struggle with China.

  • gi1242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    unfortunately the polluters do a lot of greenwashing to get public goodwill. plastic recycling is one of them unfortunately. less than 1% of plastic in use today is recycled…

    in the old days plastic recycling would only accept certain kinds of plastic. now they take everything. they don’t recycle everything. they take everything. and throw out the other kinds at the recycling facility

    I wonder if carbon capture is similar greenwashing…

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah net zero is not enough and using trees and plants to capture carbon probably isn’t enough either. We burned millions of years of plant growth in just a few centuries.

    • Shikam@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, we’re largely past the arguments about the economics of global warming and should be well into the discussions on what is technically feasible. Not many costs are too great at this point.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We currently emit a lot so the choice is: emit less with renewables or keep emitting but capture the carbon

      Since renewables are much cheaper we reduce emissions much faster then going with carbon capture. That might be a good idea down the line, but currently 80% of our energy comes from fossil fuels, so down the line is probably decades.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Carbon capture WILL be necessary but is absolutely less than useless until every possible power user has switched to renewable electricity

    Carbon capture right now is quite literally actively working to make it worse, so please don’t do carbon capture except for research purposes

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      basically everything is research scale right now, and we need to do full scale tests to make sure everything works and learn how to optimize things. there’s also non-DAC options to work on too

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have no doubt that renewables are the lowest hanging fruit at the moment, and that we could get to net-zero mostly using them. But there is a big difference between mostly and entirely. As you approach the higher-hanging fruit, things get exponentially more expensive, and there may come a point at which some form of carbon capture is needed to cover that last segment of emissions? Also, I see no mention of nuclear here. I suspect it will need to play a role, though how large that would be remains uncertain. It should definitely be included in any cost analysis though.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thing is, the time for net-zero has passed, did you hear that whooshing sound?

    To pull back from the brink, what is needed is net-negative, which ain’t happening without capture (alongside massive reduction in emissions), economics be damned, it’s an existential threat, it’s about survival. Could be as simple as massive reforestation, could be fusion generators pulling CO2 out of the air, will probably be many different things, but learning what works, as soon as possible, is imperative.

  • Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If any of you give a shit about the environment or animals, go vegan.

    Going vegan is the single biggest thing you can do to reduce your carbon footprint. apart from unaliving yourself.