• gitgud
      link
      fedilink
      164 months ago

      I suspect some are AI and others may be creative writing exercises. Some portion are probably real.

    • @geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Many of the exaggerated stories are fiction. But there are plenty of Redditors posting pictures of things they saw locally and other information which some could consider sensitive.

        • @geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Don’t get me wrong, I was referencing those too. In general, when I visited Reddit there were a lot of personal stories and pictures. These can often provide a unique pov which is not found in the news.

          Lemmy is more a forum where people discuss the news. The comments are far more advanced and interesting than Reddit. But because people (including me) are far more privacy minded, I feel like they rarely post personal experiences. This might be an unfixable dillemma.

  • @YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    204 months ago

    I know I am wary of doxxing myself, there’s so many times I’ve withheld commenting because my stories are too specific. I’ve probably shared too much already and do think about just starting over with a new account sometimes. This is my 4th account by now?

  • Desert Hermit
    link
    fedilink
    134 months ago

    It might also be that out of 97 million daily active users, if 1/10th of 1% are attention-seeking crazies, that’s 97,000 people over-sharing at absurd levels.

  • @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134 months ago

    People that have the need to share “personal stories” with basically strangers are looking for an audience first and foremost. Lemmy has way fewer people so the type of person trying to seek that attention will be going to facebook/twitter/reddit etc. If Lemmy was one of the top-ten most used sites, then we’d see a lot more of that kind of content.

  • @golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    94 months ago

    I think it might be the case for some, but mostly I think that more people on Lemmy are less focused on themselves and personal anecdotes. More often I see people here reaching for cited resources to support what they’re saying instead of “Oh one time my Uncle’s friend’s cousin…”. It still happens here, but not nearly in the same capacity from what I’ve seen.

  • @Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    84 months ago

    I think it’s because most of those personal stories were attention-grabbing fakes and there’s fewer incentives to do that on Lemmy

  • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    64 months ago

    I think let me has less personal stories than read it because Lemmy isn’t infested by bots writing personal stories.

    Or copying personal stories from previous posts, and recycling them for votes.

    You underestimate the amount of bot activity on Reddit. Some threads on all are something like 70%+ bot comments, with most being at least half.

    It’s crazy.

  • @Damionsipher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    Reddit didn’t used to be that way. Slowly over time it devolved into the same self-flagellation that happens more on “share my thought” type platforms like Twitter. I hope we are better able to manage our federations to keep that type of content at bay while remaining open enough to let people speak their truth in the face of oppression.

  • @conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    Dear Penthouse Forum reddit, I’m a 20 year-old college student and I never thought I’d be writing to the Penthouse Forum reddit, but…

    It’s the lowest common denominator of smut entertainment. The tech companies have managed to veil it all in prestige. It should be called gossip media or something.

    Instead people think there’s some kind of real human connection. Some kind of deep discussions happening.

  • @BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -84 months ago

    Privacy no longer exists; it’s now little more than an illusion.

    If you use modern technology at all, even your own thoughts aren’t safe. Existing ad tech can intuit what you are thinking before you are even aware of it, and AI will be able to dig even deeper into your mind in the near future. There is no escape.

    Fire and brimstone preachers used to scream about how God was always watching, but regardless of whether you believe in that sort thing, one thing is true: technology is always watching, and your identity and innermost thoughts can be reassembled at any time by any number of entities, and you wouldn’t even know.

    • @communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      54 months ago

      You would be surprised at the incompetence of the surveillance state. I’ve known people subject to terrorism investigations by world superpowers where the state couldn’t figure out the basic facts about that person’s life, let alone find anything that may be helpful to prosecution. This kind of fearmongering only encourages people to not be cautious. Not that the extent of surveillance isn’t terrifying, but at the other end of the table is just other human beings. All humans are fallible, including the ones who spy on us, and we can both outsmart and outmanoeuvre them if we’re serious about it.

      • @BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        It’s not just government that is the problem. The problem is that the data has been collected. It’s still being collected. It already exists. And think about that incompetence you mentioned… do you think that data is safe from less incompetent actors?

        The best time for action on protecting privacy was yesterday. The second best is right now.