Shit, we should also ban insta, fb, and google places while we’re at it.
Don’t tempt me with a good time.
Just force them to use open standards and for it to be easy for people to move platform whilst keeping all the connections to their profile: the power of such social media entities is that people are locked-in because if they move they lose the connections of both followers and those they follow, which often means family and friends.
Basically a solution similar to that adopted in Europe for phone numbers - that you can take your number with you when you move providers - would reduced social media companies down to “just a pipe for social media connectivity” which would ultimatelly kill those with the worst practices given that the barrier to entry to be a “social media provider” is way lower than to be a fixed line telephony provider.
We are on a social network platform too?
Not really. It’s just a fancy forum.
Social network platforms have corporate controlled algorithms designed to maximize addiction. At the very least, you would need a “friend” system and who the fuck follows each other on here? When I was using reddit, one person followed me and it was a bot.
One where you can use any server and client you wish, as long as it implements the same freely-available spec. You can probably access the source code of the server and client you’re using.
As with many things: the problem is not the technology itself, but the terms that capital owners demand we accept in order to use it.
As if the US government could understand this platform. It will be a shame to lose lemmy.world though
The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users
What platforms has meta bought and shut down?
I can think of zero examples myself.
CrowdTangle, MetaSpark, Moves, Onavo, Bump, Parse, etc
Not sure, most of the companies they buy they claim are to acquire their workers. They’ve bought over 90 companies from what I saw in a quick search.
They buy to acquire IP and shutter competition gaining market share. Any employees are typically systematically let go or driven to quit intentionally within 6 months to a year.
Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don’t take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.
So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?
Algorithmically quell his own cybernetic rage.
It’s already back up lmfao
Yep. But this doesn’t answer their question. I’m rooting for a Tik Tok CEO vs Meta CEO battle Royale at the inauguration.
Tom just sitting on the sidelines, eating popcorn.
Tom wouldn’t be caught dead in the same hemisphere as either of these fucks
Tom just wanted to be friends. Why can’t more people be like Tom? 😂
If Zuck gives Trump more money then why would he? Probably would just allow Meta to buy it or something dumb like that.
Well I just hope they reverse the whole bill, so we can re-appropriate the tax money back we sent to aid Israel
Why does everyone think Trumps going to allow Tiktok. He doesn’t like China, and Musk is going to push him to ban it so he can buy it.
ByteDance has a lot of money. Trump likes money. Trump’s only leverage over ByteDance is allowing TikTok, so he’ll do that in exchange for money
Zuckerberg and Meta are much more centralized in the US, which gives Trump far more options in terms of what he can offer them. Trump will give Zuckerberg something else to placate him. Probably lots of cheap H-1B labor
I haven’t seen a comment age this quickly and poorly in quite some time.
If you haven’t noticed Trump says a lot of things. He’s always talking out of both sides of his mouth. I’ll believe it when I see it, we’ll see tomorrow. Also, a delay is not overturning it.
It’s back now with a message thanking President Trump.
Who asked for a 50% stake in the company.
You’re partially right. Trump originally wanted to ban TikTok because “China.”
However, the platform’s influence on younger voters supposedly helped him to win the election, so he now favors it.
No surprise that Trump’s personal needs are far more important than real US security.
Well we knew it had to be something. I mean most of Congress is too old to know what a tik tok is.
deleted by creator
Tic Tac Toe!
Headlines that basically say the same shit twice really are swell.
If you want to produce the same shit twice, just use a colon.
I think this was less about lobbying and more about bogeyman of China.
AIPAC lobbying also
You know China vetoed a Gaza Ceasefire last march, right?
They’re also allied with Iran who militarized Hamas in the first place.
They’re also allied with Iran who militarized Hamas in the first place.
You say this like it’s a bad thing. TBH colonized people suffering from genocide should resist.
You happily traded 47,000 of Palestinian lives for 1700 israelis, congratz and fuck off.
“Issues related to voter suppression/interference, political ads and misinformation policies.”
It’s nice to see meta have learned from their own mistakes and are now trying to protect
democracyprofits.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook–Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal
I don’t know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta’s disclosure
Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it’s really depressing to see
Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter
Yes, companies hiring people in politics or with government connections is a very normal thing
This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!! \s
Sad trombone.
The 8200 division at Meta working overtime
😂
Good, finally putting that money to good use.
Stifling competition, great use indeed. Make today’s billionaires trillionaires.
TikTok are not competition, they don’t even care about profit or they would have sold 80% of ownership and would continue operating legally.
They’re a weapon
The same can be said for Meta and X. They even stopped moderating them. So why shall we ban TikTok and allow Meta and X to continue working? I am up for greater scrutiny of social media, but one that’s applied equally across all platforms.
When Meta sold data to Russia via Cambridge Analytica they recieved the largest FTC fine in history, and that was long before the law was even conceived.
If the platforms did it today then they should face the full consequences the same as TikTok.
And where is the proof that something similar has happened? Didn’t TikTok comply with every request of the US government?
And what about the lack of fact checking on Meta and X. Isn’t this a concern for you that they will spread misinformation even faster now? Where are their fines?
Didn’t TikTok comply with every request of the US government?
No. The requirements are listed in H.R. 816 Divisions H and Division I.
TikTok knows they didn’t comply with them because they made a show of shutting down. TikTok servers are centralized in Beijing.
