Literally the headline. Not illegal at all is best of course.
I’d like to have a sort of reverse Warrant Canary of sorts, that will pop if security is breached
Stream a Nintendo game.
Reverse engineer the CD key algorithm for a defunked game.
It’s ‘defunct’ but your spelling is better.
Our dog rolled in a dead bird and had to be defunked.
OP found a disc that had been sprayed with Febreze.
"I encourage violence "
Not illegal to say that at all.
If you specify a person it’ll get flagged faster. If you mention certain people you might get a visit for the secret service. Still not illegal to say but it’s often treated like it is.
I’m in a medieval reenactment society, and about a year ago some people were getting temp bans on Facebook for announcing fencing practice by saying “come stab your friends!”
If you don’t count copyright infringement as illegal, then yeah, uploading a Disney clip or song, or Beatles music. That’s probably the fastest way (on something like YouTube).
If you’re talking about anywhere/Lemmy, then just upload a post like “…?” to a popular AskLemmy community. It’ll probably get removed fairly quickly, and the ? Will help it bypass any filter that takes down anything not ending with a question mark.
Of course, if auto removals are ok, then just upload something with a banned keyword or try posting “…” to an AskLemmy community to trigger a bot that may remove posts not ending in “?”.
Post about how your breasts behaved wile bungee jumping on dull men’s club
Huh. What the hell is the context for that?
Well it seems like that would be the antithesis of dull men’s club.
If this were Reddit, opposing the genocide in Gaza and speaking out against the Biden administration for supporting it would get you reported swiftly.
CEO photos or criticism of israeli genocide ?
BTW the alt text is surrounded in [square brackets] and the link in (round brackets), not the other way around
So, to fix your link
Thanks! I do know how to do it (memotechnique is it’s like a C function) but I still mess it up from time to time 🤷🏼♀️
The least illegal thing? Reminds me of the criticisms I got because people thought I drew Muhammad (disclaimer, she was a moblin and she just happened to be named Muhammad which I did for the rep, and drawing Muhammad isn’t even an actual doctrinal prohibition, it’s one of those anachronisms like the LDS church prohibiting drinking coke,
no it’s pepsi we don’t drink).First, it didn’t get taken down so I’m not sure why you shared this. Secondly, this definitely appears to be a troll post so yeah people usually don’t like being trolled. I’m not sure why you’re acting surprised.
Edit: ignore me, I’m ignorant of the ways of twitter.
It was marked as invisible by those in charge (except for those who can go right to it) and was the sole reason images are not coded into the top right of pages anymore. But the original question about the most non-illegal ways to trigger the censors brought the incident to mind. It’s certainly not “illegal”, in fact it’s protected by the rights most nations have, yet it causes a lot of different reactions. Of note, even the series the character was inspired by could be said to have this going for it, albeit with a few differences. I drew her as a homage to people we had been talking/arguing about (there were a lot of people wishing death on each other at the time due to the current war being fresh), and I wasn’t actually anticipating it would be necessarily interpreted as actually drawing a certain historical figure.
Oh, sorry I don’t understand how censorship works on Twitter I guess.
On imgur if you post “the gif” it’s taken down immediately and your account will get banned, or so the legend goes.
Now you got my curiosity! What gif?
Look up hulk smash black widow in a private browser.
