- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
You must log in or register to comment.
No one uses telegram for privacy They use for unlimited broadcasting channels Free unlimited file hosting Large groups and communities Powerful bots and mini apps etc
deleted by creator
If they actually wanted to do something about child abuse they’d go after the conserative scum who have historically supported it and still do. Its the ones that vote for far right parties, are anti higher-ed, pro homeschooling, anti secularism, pro religious indoctrination, anti feminist, anti age of consent laws, anti sex ed, anti criminalisation of marital rape, anti combating domestic violence, pro child marriages etc instead they are constantly trying to attack human’s right to privacy which only exist on paper.
deleted by creator
The moment you dissolve rights to privacy for X scenario, you open dissolution for Y and Z as well
deleted by creator
I think this is the moment you’re overreaching.
Alternatively what you’re saying is that all gun manufacturers should go to jail for multiple counts of homicide.
Just look at the Patriot Act. Did it catch a single terrorist?
“Child molesters etc” have been online since the internet has existed and very little is done about it. They have also been active offline and very little is done about that too. If they wanted to go after them they would. They don’t, because it is not in their interest to. The threats they will go after are people they disagree with and who their higher ups want targeted. You are always in more danger from authorities than “bad guys” are.
There’s no middle ground. Either we’ll have privacy or we won’t.
It’s the warrant process and true encryption. If the cops think you’ve done something bad, they go and get a warrant. The provider turns over what they have, which should just be account info and metadata. Then the cops do good old fashioned police work and get a warrant for your personal stuff which they’ll seize and analyze.
