• @ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      395 months ago

      Kill the Baker and people can access the bread, and the resources the Baker was hoarding, and ALSO make bread. Bread making isn’t a genetic trait like hair color, it can be learned.

      • @Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah but in this town, they kill bakers . Don’t listen to this guy y’all, he’s just trying to up his baker tally so he can look cool eating bread. It’s a trap, don’t bake bread.

        Edit:

        Don’t do it, really guys, I’m not joking.

      • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You assume those people would 1. Actually make bread and not just eat what was left and then go back to being starving. 2. Somehow not be subject to the same exact economic conditions that required a baker to charge for bread in the first place (ie. Cover the cost of his inputs, afford a place to live, feed and cloth his children, etc.)

        Hoarding is a strong word. Rather than blaming a baker that is producing something that benefits other people, why don’t we focus on the people who are starving. Why are they starving? How do we help them make enough to afford bread?

      • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        155 months ago

        If maximizing evil is the goal, killing the baker is the best thing you can do. Those people will eat some temporary bread and then go on starving. What’s worse, is more people will starve as well.

        • @acockworkorange@mander.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          But then you need to set up a cult to keep on killing bakers, because there are incentives for someone else to take up the mantle.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            65 months ago

            or you take over operations, adulterate the bread with sawdust while selling the good stuff only to the 1% who can afford it. Also, maybe make it an overpriced subscription, where in order to have the privilege of buying bread, you also have to pay per loaf, too.

            If that sounds like corpo-shit… that’s because it is.

    • @fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      Yeah. Meanwhile killing CEOs has no drawbacks because they do nothing of value and horde all the money which can be used for better than just choking the economy for everyone else.

      • @Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Good CEO’s lead companies to brighter future!

        Well, whole two of them, so your chance to kill one by mistake is kinda low, go wild.

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        I wouldn’t say that they do nothing of value. Organizing companies has to happen. Is it worth their price? Not even fucking close. But crews cannot run themselves with efficiency. There has to be someone running the ship. But they do not deserve that much more. They get that by being corrupt and appeasing the investors MORE than making a company run correctly.

        • @orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          most CEOs don’t organize anything, that’s ironically what middle management does. the CEOs job is to maximize the amount of value extracted for the feudal lords

          • GladiusB
            link
            fedilink
            15 months ago

            I beg to argue they organize the middle managers. Everyone answers to someone.

            • @orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              that’s the fun part, they actually don’t, most middle managers are the controlling instance already, and any case where they aren’t is because the corporate structure has multiple upper level management layers further reducing contact to the CEO

    • @Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      Kill only the greediest, wealthiest baker in the street. Next month, kill the next most greedy wealthy baker after him. Month three, all the bakers will be fighting to give more of their bread away than the next guy

  • @Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Given the context of the recent heroic event it’s important to remember that not only is it not the baker putting up the barrier but it is someone who actually probably can’t even do their job of doing nothing very well.

    Killing the baker may lead to a problem where the bread runs out, but I suppose it’s also a good example of how baking is not magic and we could figure it our well enough to not need to put up with someone who would willingly let people starve.

    • @cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yup. The baker isn’t the one that owns the bakery. They don’t own the mills. They don’t own the farms.

      Instead, what’s happened is one mega corporation has bought most of the bakeries, they set prices to the maximum level possible and have backroom negotiations with mills that an independent baker can’t get in the room to make. The mills do the same thing with the farms. And the farms are all consolidating into few owners who get to run on almost no employees (It doesn’t take a lot to run a modern farm). Further, the mega farms and mills end up driving small time farmers out of business because the mills won’t cut deals with small time farmers like they will with the megafarmers.

      At every layer, there is some MBA asshole idiot justifying his parasitic existence because he thinks nobody else is as smart as him (even though he likely got the business because of his daddy or his wife’s daddy). He hordes the excess funds but builds himself a nice big house.

    • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Dude, people on Lemmy freak it if they don’t have their Starbucks coffee and their multiple online subscriptions.

      They will categorically not learn to make bread, instead they will flock to Uber eats for those sweet points

      People in here don’t have any idea on how hard being a baker is.

      • @Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        What are you talking about? “Ergmahgerd they like Starbucks” seriously can you hear yourself? Like what does Starbucks coffee and having online subscriptions have to do with someone’s ability to learn?

        Touch grass.

  • UnfortunateShort
    link
    fedilink
    75 months ago

    I dunno, I think the baker might already give you their bread if you threaten them with death

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        If I want to kill someone, I do not care about whatever consequences or effects it will have. That fucker is as good as dead.

  • @Squorlple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Generally, bakers are blue collar hardworkers who do not gluttonously hoard their resources and instead sell at prices necessary for sustainability with a modest to moderate level of profit margins; eliminating one baker would reduce the number of skilled workers who know how to produce goods/services critical to society. The same cannot be said about people in certain other positions whom the aforementioned hypothetical you might instead want to kill.

    If the artist believes that bakers’ role in society is not comparable to certain parasitic roles, that subtext has been lost in the satiric trope inversion.

    Edit: Apparently this is an old comic, so the inferred modern subtext is not the artist’s intent. I was trying to think of a better scenario for what the artist was trying to convey. You want to kill a child but the child has O- blood and is registered for organ donation upon death?

  • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Sure, that would be worse than a few starving people getting some bread temporarily. If the baker is dead then there will be more starving people then we started with.

    • @Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Wait, wasn’t that the point? I thought the post point was for the people to have bread for like 5 minutes and then die horribly of hunger later because they don’t know how to turn on the oven correctly without starting a fire and forget about even knowing how to mix the flour and yeast in the correct proportions and time to not create inedible lumps of overcooked flour

    • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Said someone who’s never baked before, or known a baker, or have watched any culinary show. Following one simplified recipe and hope it turns out alright? You haven’t learned baking as a trade. Might as well say Plumbing or Carpentry is easy. Sure they can glue two pipes together. But, can they design and implement a fully functioning DWV system that’s up to code? I would rather rewire an entire house’s electrical system than spend a whole day trying to figure out why I can’t knead this fucking dough right.

      • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Nice how people always assume someone knows nothing of a subject they proclaim knowledge of innit. I do and have baked more than a couple things iny life Mr. knowitall

        • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          eh, I put plenty of “or” statements in there. If you proclaim knowledge and then exclaim an ignorant claim, I’m just musing on your assuming tirade.

          There is such a thing as Culinary School, you see?