Seriously though, don’t do violence.

    • @HeyJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      205 months ago

      Not sure if you know the reason for the song, but here is the info behind it… the actual footage was brutal as well.

      A Song Inspired by an Infamous Suicide

      Patrick found the lyrical inspiration for “Hey Man Nice Shot” from the January 1987 suicide of Pennsylvania State Treasurer R. Budd Dwyer. It occurred on the day Dwyer was to be sentenced for 11 counts of bribery for which he had faced up to 55 years in prison and a $305,000 fine, according to an Associated Press article from the time. No money was said to have exchanged hands. The public official spent 20 minutes on live television proclaiming his innocence, then shot himself to death. The incident shocked family, friends, and political associates, not to mention the viewing audience.

      • @Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        I saw that video when I was in middle school and found out later in my teens that song was about that headshot. It’s a good song.

      • @tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        25 months ago

        Wasn’t that the guy who was later found to be innocent? He tried to fight the charges, got convicted, killed himself, and THEN they figured out he really didn’t do it?

      • @chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        125 months ago

        Depends on your dataset, confidence, and margin of error.

        Assuming that 95% of billionaires will act similarly and 750-ish total billionaires in the US, if you want to have 99% confidence and 1% margin of error, you’ll need a minimum sample size of around 600.

        We really should be thorough. For science.

        • @Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          95 months ago

          Usually I would nit pick the hypothesis you want to confirm and the math you used, but for some reason 600 sounds right.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      475 months ago

      It is bad if used as the first approach.

      It is fine when used in self defense or when all peaceful approaches have been exhausted in response to oppression and other malicious actions. It does matter when and why it is used.

      • @Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Agreed. This happened because both parties are bought and paid for by big corpo. Our vote is only on how to address some of the social issue symptoms, if at all, of our crony capitalist economy, and only if they don’t meaningfully effect corpo profits.

        Example “please leftwing Obama, save us from this for profit healthcare hell!” proceeds to further enshrine for profit insurer leeches in a plan made from the heritage foundation because big corpo demand line go up.

        The people don’t get a vote on the crony capitalist economy.

        When we wish to protest, we’re now sent to designated protest zones out of the eyelines and profit operations of those we protest, making such “protests” as effective as masturbation in creating change.

        This is happening because they have made us this desperate,and taken away/castrated our non-violent options. Some are apparently finally realizing that our votes and our protest have been manipulated by the capitalists that know they’re doing us harm into still technically existing, but no longer mattering.

        Gotta hand it to them, it’s far more insidious than overt slavery with chains.

  • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    455 months ago

    I was really hoping we would avoid violence by electing people like Bernie Sanders. Instead it looks like the class warfare will come to violence.

  • @devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    415 months ago

    If it works it works. Humans have been using as an effective way to accomplish things for millennia.

    The current capitalism overlords may not be happy when it’s used the other way around to what they are used to.

    • GladiusB
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      “Violence is a precipitation of two sides unwilling to compromise.”

      • Sun Tzu The Art of War
  • @Notyou@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    365 months ago

    Violence gave us (the US) freedom from being a colony, freedom from slavery, workers rights, women’s rights…wait a minute.

    Why do we get told to not do violence again? Seems like we just need a little bit of organized violence and we can solve problems.

    • @BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      20
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Because violence is a tragedy and in an ideal world there would be no need for it. However, fewer and fewer people these days can pretend we live in an ideal world.

      • @Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        45 months ago

        I do think, ideally, we should be able to resolve disputes without violence. We don’t live in that world though. Mainly because people that have a lot power and resources worked to keep it that way. They actively work against progress.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -15 months ago

        Equivocation much? By your logic either idiots set the standards or it’s morally defensible to attack people who kill us slowly.

        • @BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          55 months ago

          I do think it’s morally defensible for an oppressed group to direct violence toward their oppressors. It’s also a tragedy that it comes to that but tragedy and justice are not mutually exclusive. I also think only an idiot would accept the standards in which we are expected to live, therefore to demand satisfaction with such standards would be idiotic.

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            It doesn’t really sound like we disagree about anything. Pardon my earlier tone. I should have been mellower, or at least funnier.

  • @Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    345 months ago

    Maybe if several more CEOs and C Suite suits are murdered in the street, then my insurance rates will only rise by single digits next year.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    345 months ago

    For legal reason I wish to say that I don’t advocate violence. I also say that, I really think this was the only way this was going to happen.

    Billionaires only do the right thing if it’s profitable or if they’re afraid.

    • @Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      85 months ago

      I don’t want to advocate violence too, but there’s going to be a next CEO, and somebody must keep renting bikes.

    • I’m going with I don’t advocate for violence, but I also won’t condemn this use of it. If I knew a better way to attempt to cause change, I would advocate for that. But it is hard to argue with the result. (Anthem reversal)

    • @Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      I want to advocate for violence, I’m not going to participate but violence is the only way for change sometimes

  • SiblingNoah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    335 months ago

    “Your health insurance doesn’t want you to know this one cool trick!”

  • @Tin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    225 months ago

    Ah, good. So the corrupt, evil, and greedy tactics of health insurers are finally mitigated to… checks notes oh, to what they were last week.

    You know they’re sitting on a wish list of awful policies while they’re waiting for this to blow over so they can implement them when we aren’t looking. Fuck that.

  • @shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    215 months ago

    “Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent”

    ~ Asimov

    And here we are, nailed to the fucking wall. I’m fine with expanding this “incompetence”.

    • Lovable Sidekick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      So like, one rough day, and I mean really rough? Sounds familiar, wait it’s coming back… dictator but only on day one - that kind of thing?

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    165 months ago

    Don’t do violence

    This wasn’t violent. It was calm and deliberate and it really seems like what Brian wanted with how he led his life. Seems like a lot of other CEOs of insurance companies and other hyper predatory industries are likely a bit jealous of Brian getting the result they all seem to be aiming for with their own calm, deliberate actions in life.

    Also, the stock went up, so weird that we aren’t really celebrating the boost to shareholder value - again, this was the endeavor that Brian committed his life to. He’d be overjoyed to have made an additional $7million on paper for man also worth $14 billion in family wealth.

    Did you think it was easy for Brian to sign the death warrants of tens/hundreds of thousands of people? Through a lot of indirect action and often while enjoying a very lovely omikase sushi lunch with a different chef flown in from Kyoto each day to prepare? No. It wasn’t easy. But you know what, he rolled his sleeves up and he did it, because that’s just the kind of man he was until he was shot in the back of the head.

    Hope you all have a good day at work today with your own decisions, remaining CEOs, board members of predatory industries and random billionaires. We know you’ll stay focused on doing the most valuable thing with your time today