This community is bizarre and probably the most genuine one I’ve stumbled upon. How do I consistently get more comments then updoots here?
Smurf yeah we can.
Smurfing hell… I thought I was going to be the smartass in this thread.
Aladeen
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo
The the the the the, the the the the the the the the; the the the the the the.
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
I saw a mechanic throw down a wrench and shout “the fuck-fucking fucker’s fucking fucked AGAIN” and we all knew the deadline needed a push.
mother-motherfuck
mother-motherfuck-fuck
motherfuck, motherfuck,
Noinch noinch noinch.
I am groot.
I am Groot.
Gary, Gary… Gary?
deleted by creator
“Dude”
In theory, yes. In practice, no.
The association between meaning and word is arbitrary, but socially dictated. You’d need to have other people accepting that that word conveys that meaning in at least some context.
The simple answer to your question is no. Language is as much about distinction and exclusion as it is about description. The word “circle” stands for the description and properties of the circle, but would be incoherent if it did not also exclude straight lines.
You can often find examples where some things are considered premium or desirable not for the properties is has, but for what it lacks. Just think of all the products marketed to not have something like BPA, fat, sugar, Carbs, gluten, asbestos, lead, and even cruelty.
Let me introduce you to Goptjaam, probably the closest “language” that fits what you mean: https://youtu.be/ze5i_e_ryTk
ACK! ACK ACK ACK ACK. ACK ACK.
He comes in peace!
Ook.
I thought we did this with buffalo
sounds skibidi
fnord
