• @thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      166 months ago

      It’s hard but not impossible, as even ‘retail displays’ run an OS in the background to control input switching, image settings etc.

      Honestly the best thing to do is buy whatever TV you want (we have a couple of the LG OLEDs in our household), and don’t ever plug them into your network (or WiFi). Otherwise, with updates OS and apps become sluggish, with more ads crammed in.

      Instead, use a seperate media player (e.g. Apple TV if you’re already on the iOS ecosystem, Nvidia Shield or similar for Android, HTPC if you’re so inclined etc.) - they’re more powerful, arguably more secure & private, and portable between displays if/when you upgrade.

      • @coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        Unfortunately EtherNet over HDMI exists so your your TV can still access the Internet if the Apple TV or Nvidia Shield has Internet access. To prevent that you have to make sure use older HDMI cable less then HDMI 1.4.

        • @Majestic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          Never been implemented. It doesn’t exist.

          Cables support it but zero devices made it to the consumer market and both devices would need to support it for it to work. It’s a dead standard from another era at this point. WiFi speeds have become so significant that there’s just no reason for the additional costs that would be involved.

          I admit if half of the people out there who bought smart TVs started refusing to connect them to the internet and bought streaming boxes instead there might be an incentive for TV makers to try it but no incentive for streaming devices to help them do it and at that point it’s just easier for TV makers to require an internet connection or the TV doesn’t work.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You’ll see these marketed as monitors sometimes, from what I’ve seen. Mostly it’s for businesses but if you want a dumb screen to connect things to, it might be called a “monitor” even if it has the form factor of a TV.

  • Random_Character_A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    486 months ago

    My current TV is clawing my firewall like squirrel with rabies. I’m sure the next one will too.

  • @BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    206 months ago

    Don’t ever connect them to the internet. Period.

    If it’s required, buy a different tv. It’s not difficult to look that up beforehand.

    • Alphane MoonOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 months ago

      I suspect in the near future it will be impossible to buy a TV without spyware/adware. The only option will be to not connect it to the internet and run your own Raspberry PI/SBC based solution.

      • @BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

        The super budget/sold at a loss TVs will absolutely be gutted for spyware.

        • Alphane MoonOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 months ago

          Monitors aren’t being pumped full of this stuff and so won’t the premium televisions.

          I have a feeling premium TVs won’t escape adware/spyware either. They can get their margin on the hardware and earn some more money on spyware; I don’t see what incentive they have to not do both. I hope I am wrong though.

          • @thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 months ago

            You’re not wrong, there are a number of videos from Louis Rossman (right to repair advocate) on YouTube lambasting LG for doing this very thing on their high-end G-series OLED TVs; including defaulting to opt-in to marketing and providing PIR data after an automatic update.

        • @Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Looks at the top of the line Samsung Odessey 49"/54" ultrawide monitor. Looks at specs. Reread this comment.

          Uhuh

      • @slumberlust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        If I worked for the manufacturer I’d just piggy back on other TVs networks to communicate. Wouldn’t work if you live in the country but for everyone else I’d just need a similar brand within wifi range.

  • @FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    206 months ago

    I have an old 60 inch 1080p TV from the early days of smart tvs. It has a built in app for plex and youtube, a remote that works as a pointer, it’s insanely slow but it has zero ads and I’m never ever getting a newer model.

    • @mrvictory1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Same here, one of our “smart” TVs needs Ethernet for networking, the other needs a Wi-Fi dongle. Rest aren’t even smart. All 1080p.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      Yup. My 58" 4k LG TV has a bunch of apps (we only need Netflix and Jellyfin), and the only ads I’ve seen are in their apps, which don’t need to be opened. It’s a little slow and apparently can’t even handle Jellyfin over HTTPS, but it works well.

      My SO wants a bigger TV, and I’m dreading looking through the current market to find a decent replacement. I’d really like OLED and for it to be a few inches bigger, but it seems everything has ads and spyware out of the box. Screw that…

    • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      Getting increasingly hard.

      I finally learned why those 50" tvs are so cheap, like $200. Buy a dumb TV that’s the same size is easily 5x the price.

      Then again, nobody needs a TV and I only bought one during the pandemic, then connected it to my pi hole.

      • billwashere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        You can find them. Look for digital signage. And then start crying at the cost.

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        If you manage to have access to AliExpress, you can have it shipped.

        When that is not an option, a big computer screen and a tv card.

        • @DampCanary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          Aliexprees is great for low buget electronics,
          but I’m skeptical about anything larger.
          Plus with EU’s hike on tarifs and delivery services quality it’s like playing worst type of gambling.

          A TV card(and PC obviously) with screen could be for me,
          but there is no way my parents would agree to such setup.

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Amazon ships the exact same fare of electronics. If it serves of any consolation…

            If you have a laptop, there are small USB tv tunners available. If not, a smarphone can access a good deal of content. And depending on what country you are, you might have access to your national channels (open signal ones) over the net.

            For the rest: Aaaaarrrr, me ladies! May the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster fill our sails and set our course for rich waters!

  • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    116 months ago

    Anyone know of a reasonably priced OLED/QLED, >60", 4k TV without smart features?

    I really don’t want the spyware and adware that come with newer smart TVs, and I’m willing to pay a bit of a premium for it. I’d also be happy with a unicorn smart TV that doesn’t have any of those anti-features.

    • @surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      What about just not connecting it to the network? Then put a video device on it like Roku or Apple tv or whatever.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        just not connecting it to the network?

        Some TVs require connecting to the network to set it up, and I’m concerned TV manufacturers will get more brazen going forward. If there’s a company that doesn’t do this nonsense, I’d rather reward them for being good instead of working around misfeatures in popular brands.

        Roku

        Has ads that can be disabled, at least as-of last year. Not sure how long that’ll last…

        Apple TV

        Apple also seems interested in ads.

        Any other option will likely degrade to having ads at some point. I could probably get rid of them w/ a PiHole or something, but that could end up being a game of whack-a-mole.

        I’ll probably end up w/ a Raspberry Pi or something running Kodi or similar, which is really annoying because that’s yet another thing I have to self-host just to avoid this stupid obsession with ads.

        • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          In the future we might have to hack our TV’s to make them ours…like disconnect the camera and the microphone or feed them bullshit data or inject trick hacks… 🤔 Hmm what is this thing? rm -f…copy paste to see what it does! Oh shit! Half the country looses Disney plus for a few days. And it repeats 5 times every month so they stop fucking with us.

        • ThePowerOfGeek
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          I know this isn’t purely TV-related, but there used to be a secret menu for Roku where you could disable home screen ads. That stopped working for me several months ago. So I recently bought an Onn box (which is basically Android TV, but had as very cluttered UI) and side-loaded one of the open source launchers onto it. It’s been a much better experience than Roku, not least because there’s are no more home screen ads.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            there used to be a secret menu for Roku where you could disable home screen ads

            That’s the first link. If it no longer works, I guess Roku isn’t an option anymore. 😟

            • ThePowerOfGeek
              link
              fedilink
              English
              36 months ago

              I should clarify: the secret menu can still be navigated to and the options there set. But ads now appear regardless. I went back into the menu and verified the options hadn’t changed (they hadn’t). It’s like Roku has gotten wind of the exploit and ‘fixed’ their OS to ignore those options.

        • @mrvictory1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          Some TVs require connecting to the network to set it up

          Change Wi-Fi password, connect to Wi-Fi and complete setup, restore old password.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            The problem is they are showing they’re willing to force firmware updates to use the TV. So even if the setup experience is decent in reviews, that could could absolutely change for the next person (i.e. they could require updates every N months).

            If a company pulls that BS, I’m uninterested in buying it. I don’t care if there’s a community workaround, I’m unwilling to support a company that thinks it owns the hardware I bought.

  • @nshibj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    116 months ago

    What’s with the clickbait title?

    This is not news, it has been happening since Smart TVs started being a thing.

    One of the most common TV OSs is AndroidTV / GoogleTV. Google is the biggest ad company in the world.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    normal people can’t just… grab a single board PC and… install Linux on it! What are they supposed to do!?

    I dunno, suffer, I guess. Pass the keyboard. I’m feeling Friends.

    edit: my cousin and his wife came over about four months ago and saw we used a keyboard and the TV was just a computer and he went “why the fuck haven’t we just done that?”. He doesn’t know know Linux, but he has a Steam Deck and got by alright.

    Sometimes, they just need the idea, a little push.

    • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      For a lot of people it’s a good use that’s the difference. I’ve been fucking around trying to set up home assistant for a year when I have time (yeah idk I know it’s supposed to be plug and play but it isn’t for me), but my wife and I were talking this morning and she’s the computer person and once we live somewhere there’s a smart thermostat she’s probably going to set it up because at that point it’s worth the effort, and if she didn’t at that point it would be worth me dedicating the consistent effort to make happen. What you’re describing is similar. If I see it I might try it if not doing it is inconvenient

    • HeyListenWatchOut
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 months ago

      Not good enough. Any OTA updates your TV can get over the web will eventually be trying to circumvent your IP blacklists to shove in any ad-riddled garbage they can.

      Literally just blacklist your TV’s MAC address, and use a dedicated set top box of some kind to avoid this shit. My current choice is my NVIDIA Shield Pro 2019, which I installed a 3rd party WOLF launcher (there’s also F-Launcher) and turned off auto-updates so I could avoid NVIDIA and Google doing the same.

      At some point, I will probably need to switch to a NUC or other HTPC with some flavor of Linux on it, as eventually the Shield may succumb to this shit as well.