• Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    Side note: “I’mma” is a contraction of the whole phrase “I’m going to” or “I’m about to” so it’s followed immediately by the verb indicating what you’ll be doing:

    “I’mma rawdog this sucker without backups.”

    Yes, I added sucker, because it’s going to suck up all your time and data, sucka!

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Op should have used “I’m finna rawdog this jawn no backup style”

      For no reason other than mixed US slang from different regions sounds funnier to my ear

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s the lightly slangy version I would normally use, but as long as I was being pedantic I thought I’d better avoid any contractions in that part.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just do a fresh install man. I’m getting anxiety just by looking at it.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        The system files aren’t writable, instead you download a new system image when you want to update. No dependency hell or weird issues because these system images are all tested. Your system also keeps one or two old ones around and if by some chance something does go wrong you just select the old one at boot.

        Downside is you’re more limited on installing software. You can force install things the traditional way but that kinda defeats the point. Instead you have to use things like FlatPak or AppImages which covers most GUI apps you could want. For command line apps you will have to use something like DistroBox.

        It’s a trade off but for casual desktop users it is super stable and pretty simple. Updates come out daily (depending on distro) and they just get all their software from the software center app with a nice GUI.

        • Botzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can do gui apps too! I used distrobox to run WebEx on an Ubuntu image for an interview. Just had to get to the actual binary to launch and it worked seamlessly.

          • Jess@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have to ask, do you use X11 or Wayland? I’m struggling to get Webex working for calls (video or otherwise) under Wayland.

            • Botzo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              IIRC that was X11. It has admittedly been a minute. And by a minute, I mean a year.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        (correct me if I’m wrong, I’m also new at this)

        There are two partitions. One with the current system, one with the previous system. Updates are applied in a whole batch at once, once in a while.

        Current system is cloned into the old one and an update is applied to the clone.

        Once the update is complete, system reboots in the clone, and what was the current system becomes the previous one.

        If something goes bad, you can reboot into the previous system and fix the clone.

          • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, it uses an immutable atomic distro. I don’t know about Android phones, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

          • ProjectPatatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe this is how android has been for as long as i have used it. At least A6 or A7. Could be earlier but I haven’t used those enough

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The atomic distro would do a backup and if update goes wrong, it automatically boots back into the previous one.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve updated an Arch install after not being used for 2 years. I don’t think there were any issues.

    I’ve experienced far more issues upgrading to a new major release of an apt based distro though…

    • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then you were definitely lucky with the timeframe. Arch specifically sometimes has updates you need a recent version of pacman to even apply, which means you’ll be left behind if you wait for too long. Last time was the switch to .zstd compressed packages: if you didn’t have a pacman that supported them you had to manually go and find a pacman from the correct time frame plus all it’s deps.

  • Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe I’m just screaming into the void here, but does it seem like, as a person who is still relatively out of touch with linux, I don’t necessarily have to update my Arch distribution whenever there are new updates available? I could theoretically just go on downloading new programs, uninstalling old ones, using everything as it sits until theoretically something breaks?

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t necessarily have to update my Arch distribution whenever there are new updates available

      Clearly, op agrees

    • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should always run a full upgrade when installing a new package to make sure your versions are all in sync. Like if your new package is looking for version 1.1 and you have 1.0 installed, the new package won’t work. In general, everything should be installed with ‘pacman -Syu’ not just ‘pacman -S’

      If you don’t install any new packages, then no you don’t need to upgrade anything. You’re just missing out on security patches and upgraded features. It’s worth running occasional upgrades.

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        pacman -S without update is safe and will just install a version that was in the repos at the time you last dis an update. stuff gets removed from repos after like a month though…

    • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Iirc, the Arch wiki says you should synchronize all packages while adding new ones, and it’s technically unsupported. It might work in some cases, but personally I didn’t have to do much to not be able to launch something because symbols missing in libraries or no such file altogether. To avoid problems it’s better to sync packages fully at least once in a while.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    And they were never heard from AGAIN! Oooooooo It is horror month, and that’s pretty scary! :-D

  • helaslo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that is why I use Opensuse tumbleweed, no worries ever (zypper takes a snapshot before and after each upgrade, single command to roll back)