• @mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    799 months ago

    There are a lot of reasons, but all of the NATO countries that were supplying Ukraine put very tight restrictions on how that equipment could be used. For example, none of the aircraft or artillery were allowed to be fired into Russia for fear of a nuclear escalation.

    They’ve been slowly relaxing that restriction and it gave Ukraine more freedom to run the campaign as they see fit

    • Don_DickleOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      299 months ago

      I am rooting for them. I hope they do like the Wagner Group and make it all the way to Moscow.

      • @foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I hope Ukraine fills in the gap to Kazakhstan and takes everything south until Georgia.

        Maybe Georgians would actually finally have a decent situation.

        Maybe. 😕

        I’d love to visit St Petersburg, Finland, someday.

    • @tetrachromacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      289 months ago

      I believe also that the predominating thought in this war among the generals that plan it is that a shake up to the current status quo was needed. Invading Russia gives Ukraine a bit of leverage, plus it draws away RU troops from the front line so that Ukraine may be able to retake a bit of ground.

      Grand Poobah Pooty Putin can only say so many times that he’s moving nukes to ready status or whatever until it becomes clear he’s not going to use them. Nuking anybody, especially Ukraine, would be a tacit admission to the world that he’s losing this war. If he did, NATO would likely get involved presumably because they would consider the fallout drifting over Europe to be an act of war, but a casus belli is a casus belli.

      So yeah, I can see NATO countries being ok with a strike inside of Russia now. Makes total sense to me. I’m just surprised it took this long to get there.

  • @Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    Ukraine struggles to repel the constant attacks on the eastern front so by attacking Russia in the north, it forces them to move troops from elsewhere thus making them to stop the attacks due to lack of manpower and go on defence instead. This eases the pressure on the Ukrainian defenders.

    This newly acquired land is also something they can use to trade back parts of their own land if and when the peace negotitations start.

    It also further diminishes the credibility of the Russian army and leadership.

  • @pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    They’re probably tired of being used just as a customer for the military industrial complex and want to go back to their normal lives. They also probably have a ton of intel on the enemy’s weaknesses to shut putin and his cronies down.

    I hope they succeed at the earliest.

    • @AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 months ago

      I still find that insane.

      “Russia has been attacking us for 2 years. We’re going to attack back.” “No, don’t do that. That will escalate things.” “Oh cool, I guess we’ll just keep taking it.”

      • @JakenVeina@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        Slight distinction, though maybe not so much a practical one: it was more “Don’t do that with our weapons, Russia will get mad at us, instead of just you.”

  • @uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Russia is/was good fighting Ukraine from ‘behind the fence’ with heavy weapons. Ukraine got tired to be kept on short leash and not able to fight back. Right?