• @zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    129 months ago

    I thought we were just adaptable and “whatever”.

    I still have CDs and records. It’s all burned to digital format, but still. I can’t imagine that anyone misses cassettes.

    • @accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      There’s some nostalgia. Also, cassettes can sound very good. If you have a good cassette, a good recorder and a good audio source, that is.

      • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Eh. The more you listen though, the worse it gets. Tapes are an inherently temporary medium. If that’s your jam, it’s cool. But I don’t want my music degrading over time.

        • @accideath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          I mean, I wouldn’t use them as primary mean of keeping a music collection. But they’re great if you happen to have an old sound deck or car that doesn’t take CD. You make yourself a handful of mixtapes and you’re ready to go. Much nicer than some bluetooth-cassette adapter.

          • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            TBH, if I had a car that old that I was keeping for some reason–as opposed to trading in for something more efficient–I’d replace the stereo.

            • @accideath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              If the car was old enough and vintage itself, I‘d try to keep it as original as possible. And that includes the stereo. Replacement stereos usually don’t fit in well with the rest of the car. I also love to work with limitations like that in general, be it analog audio, photography, etc.

              • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                I don’t hold much of anything as sacred; if I had a ‘classic’ car (and unlimited funds), I would absolutely turn it into a more modern beast. Analog photography is interesting to me because of the inherent limitations of the media, and the difficulty in replicating that with modern tools (esp. large format wet plate photography). But I see cars as being too utilitarian to fall into that category. Would it ruin the ‘value’? Sure. But that’s irrelevant to me for utilitarian items.

                I understand where you’re coming from, but I wouldn’t be interested in a vintage car that sucks gas like it’s going out of style and spews out more emissions than a diesel truck rolling coal. (And, FWIW, my first car was an '84 Monte Carlo SS that I promptly put a 400ci short block in.)

                • @accideath@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  39 months ago

                  I like things with history thus I‘d never modify something I consider vintage, as long as I can keep it working in its original condition. And for any modifications that go beyond swapping the radio or the wheels, I don’t have the know how anyways. And if I‘d have to pay someone for modifications I could just invest that money into a better car that doesn’t need modifications.

                  Also, I’m German, so a lot of the 20-40 year old cars you can still get probably have better efficiency than most US cars of the same age. A 30 year old VW Golf doesn’t need much more fuel than a modern one.

                  For analog music it’s similar to photography for me. It’s about the limits. The same way I love that I only have 36 pictures on a film, I love that I only have 90 minutes I can put on a mixtape and that, to get those, I have to split it as exactly in the middle as possible. It’s a challenge and the reward is a perfectly mastered little object that holds my playlist. I do play vinyl records on my sound deck but I don’t always want to listen to an album and just plugging in a bluetooth receiver is so hopelessly unromantic. A carefully crafted cassette though… Although I will probably listen to more CDs when I get the CD-Deck fixed, eventually.

                  But yes, that’s all very much not utilitarian, which is why, when I just want to listen to music, I listen on Apple Music and why I bought a bluetooth-fm-transmitter for the one car at my work that doesn’t have bluetooth or aux-in.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      I don’t wish we’d go back to using cassettes as a primary music medium, but I think it would be fun to revisit that era of tech and play with them for a little while. Like I think if my 10 year old niece discovered a box of cassette tapes and asked “what are these” I think we could have an hour or two of fun playing with my old boom box.

  • @HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    119 months ago

    I still buy CDs, and I still rip them myself (usually 320kbps CBR; I’ve noted that 320kbps VBR sounds really bad in comparison), and manually put them on an SD card that goes into my phone. Sometimes I even use a set of Shure headphones with a <<gasp>> CORD!

    If you rip the CD yourself, no digital platform can reach into your home and take that from you. When you ‘buy’ digital licenses to listen to music on streaming platforms, changes in licensing can mean that Spotify, or whoever, can remove your ability to listen to it.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Favorite band of mine was running a kickstarter for their next album. They had lots of add-ons you could also purchase, from T-shirts and such to copies of their previous albums on various formats. I bought a total of five albums on CD, ripped them all to FLAC and now the discs sit safely in my CD rack and I can listen to the music on any device I own. To deprive me of my music you would have to commit a burglary.

  • @RinseDrizzle@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 months ago

    I need to figure out a new system for acquiring tunes. Tricky bit is while I want to buy stuff outright, I would never financially recover if I paid $1 per tune. I DJ, and mix with a very wide, relatively niche catalogue. What I’m spinning is still only a fraction of what I listen to and would want in the personal collection.

    Anyone know of a decent service that grants access to tons of music, downloads and transfers enabled, without demolishing my bank?

    Otherwise, I know there are potential means of sailing the seas again, which some may take under consideration…

    • A Wild Mimic appears!
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I still use my Deezer subscription and the old Deemix-GUI, which is a mixture of the high seas and having a subscription.

      disclaimer: deemix has has been discontinued 2 years ago, and the default login doesnt work (for me); the alternative ARL-Login still works fine tho.

      alternatively there’s always soulseek (which still astounds me - this thing is still alive and kicking after such a long time)

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    I’m a millennial, so…

    I never had a record collection. When I was growing up they were considered old fashioned and obsolete, audiophiles were still clinging onto them muttering about how they sound “warmer” or whatever. My parents had records that I wasn’t really interested in.

    Cassettes were kind of my childhood. I owned a series of tape recorders and/or boom boxes with cassette decks, and went from children’s programming on cassette tape to recording music off the radio. Though I really did catch the tail end of the format.

    By the time I was a teenager, digital audio was all the rage. CDs were the gold standard of audio quality, maybe you still had a cassette deck in your car, and mp3s were the hot new thing. Everybody was pirating music on file sharing services. Everybody was playing around with Windows Media Player’s visualizer settings. Soon people were buying music from iTunes or subscribing to Pandora or Spotify.

    But given I remember hi-fi stereos in the late 90’s coming with turntables, cassette decks and CD players, you’d have to have been an idiot to repeatedly throw away your music collection as each format comes out especially given you could record mix tapes from vinyl and cassette, and it’s been fairly trivial to rip from all three formats to mp3 for pretty much the entire 21st century so far.

    • TXL
      link
      fedilink
      39 months ago

      You’d have to be mental to replace vinyl with tapes of all things. Going digital, no media, or subscription can kind of make sense for accessibility and other reasons.

      • @9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        Tape was all about portability IMO—you could take your music with you using a boombox, walkman or of course your car stereo.

        I don’t think most people typically replaced whole vinyl record libraries, but they will have bought more things on tape during the period.

  • @Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    39 months ago

    Look, you can buy music on vinyl, CD or digital and own it forever. You can also subscribe to a service that has every song ever made by man on demand for like $10 a month. It can be both!

    At the end of the day, it’s just a great time to be alive if you’ve got ears and can listen.

  • @Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    39 months ago

    My old man had 8-tracks in his old retired cruiser lol. Anyway I was never into music as a kid; I’m mad for wholly different reasons.