• @Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yup, see the person below you saying almost exactly that in more clinical - but clearly sincere - terms.

        Edit: When I say they are “sincere” that is not to say there is any merit to what they are saying. I’m pointing out that they actually believe this garbage is justification for the mass slaughter of children.

    • @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Hamas is already willing to agree to the US peace plan, so the only thing preventing the rest of the hostages making it to their homes is political will, and with much less risk.

    • @mal3oon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Are semitic people white? If so, so are the Arabs.

      Hamas kidnap kills then kidnap a bunch of israeli people hide them among civilians and within even their refugee camps IDF frees some of them Lots of civilian casualties Pro-Pal peeps, oh no, look what the IDF did

      I’m glad the hostages were saved, and can’t wait for hamas to lose.

      • Phoenixz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        So you’re fine with 200+ dead civilians to save 4 hostages?

      • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        This echo chamber doesn’t want to hear about the fact that Hamas is a murderous terror group that intentionally endangers Palestinian civilians to further its religious and political cause.

        • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Because it is victim blaming bullshit to justify the genocide against Palestinians. Whatever Hamas is doesn’t justify the atrocities committed by Israel especially since Oct. 7 but also the Decades before. Did you know more than 500 Palestinians were murdered in the Westbank since Oct. 7? There is no Hamas there, but now that the Israeli fascists can get away with it, they enjoy their impunity as they murder, rape and pillage.

          • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            There was a ceasefire on Oct. 6. Then Hamas and other Palestinian fighters started the present conflict in Gaza on Oct.7. I won’t recount how because Lemmy doesn’t like to hear when what they perceive to be a victim group commits unthinkable atrocities. But then they took these hostages back into Gaza, and hid them in tunnels under civilian infrastructure. This is fact. Hamas started the present war, but everyone only blames Israel. I believe this qualifies as what you call victim blaming bullshit.

            • @hglman@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              The war started in 1947, and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people, any hand waving about some other starting point, is intentional revisionism by the Zionists to cover the scope and scale of their crimes. Which has now grown to a scale rivaling any genocidal you wish to name.

              • @C0unterfactual@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Regional tension has been going on for far longer than that, but Hamas is the elected government currently in Gaza. They began the current fighting. End of story.

            • @Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              011 months ago

              There was a ceasefire on October 6? Then how come more than 200 Palestinians have been murdered by the Israeli occupation in 2023 before October 6?

    • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It’s only 200 people. How many people am I worth? 200 kidnappers? 199kidnapers and I kid? 198 kidnappers, 2 kids, 3 moms, 5 elders and cousin Vinny? Couldn’t they just get the victims out and catch the kidnappers instead?

    • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -171 year ago

      Obviously it’s good to minimize collateral damage and casualties wherever possible. But I see no issue with this result.

      If a country values the lives of their citizens they will rescue them and spill any blood needed. Conversely, a nation that values its cut will try to minimize the harm that could come to them and keep hostages far from where they are.

        • @Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 year ago

          I agree, Hamas is a criminal terrorist organization that does not value the lives of Palestinians. I mean a criminal terrorist organization hiding hostages amongst civilians in a heavily populated area they are worse than the example you gave because they intentionally put those civilians at risk of harm.

      • @kaffiene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        If a terrorist holds hostages in amongst hundreds of INNOCENT PEOPLE it’s fine to massacre them all. When you could have just got all your hostages released by accepting peace. Cool moral compass you have there

      • LoudWaterHombre
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        What if Hamas is spilling blood because they value their citizens and land?

        • @Guydht@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          because they value their citizens

          Hiding hostages in a highly populated residential area, without any means of self defense or even evacuation safe zones, is not called valuing the citizens. It’s called using them as leverage, something terrorists love doing to civilians.

          What did the spilling of blood on oct.7 did to Palestinians? Make them live in hell for over 8 months? Make thousands die? And for what, for massacring Israelis? What do you think Hamas has done in oct.7 that would make you think they “value their citizens” - coz to me it only looks like they just wanna kill jews.

          • LoudWaterHombre
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What makes you think they don’t think that? In the end palastine was occupied by Israelis. It said a good government spills blood for its citizen, how can you be so god damn stubborn to not see that this point holds just as valid for palastine and Hamas. Of course you can cherry pick one thing that is not protecting citizen but I believe you can do the same thing with Israel. Like the US is constantly fucking up its own people, I’m sure you can cherry pick an event in Israel too. How much thought went into the citizens as they came up with the idea to plant Israel in the middle of a Jewish hate triangle where they are threatened and attacked on a so regular basis, they need stuff like the fucking Iron Dome in their cities?

        • Spzi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          What do you mean? Of course they do. It’s not a contradiction, because they are adversaries.

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Great news. Not sure if genocide of the Gaza population is necessary for that.

    • @catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      It is not.

      This article doesn’t mention if anyone was killed in the raid, Hamas or civilians.

      • @Monomate@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know right? I’ve always thought calling it genocide a flagrant exxageration. When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

        To be a true genocide, it must be an indiscriminate elimination of the population of a nation or an ethnicity. It’s not the case of Isreal, which is targeting specifically the militants of Hamas. Just because there are civilian colateral damage in the process does not make it a genocide automatically, because the civilians are not what the IDF is after. They’re after Hamas militants. Gaza has a very high population density, and the Hamas militants don’t use any uniform to differentiate them from the civilians. They do it on purpose to make the IDF hesitant, and get them by surprise. They hide themselves in buildings that they know the IDF would be hesitant to attack, like hospitals, schools and mosques. They play dirty, and then cry genocide when the IDF respond to their missiles sent to Israel’s territory.

        • @JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

          That’s just lack of education on your part, though. Neither the Cambodian Genocide nor the Rwandan Genocide would be a genocide according to you, but in reality these were two of the worst genocides in the last 50 years.

          Come to think of it, neither would the Bosnian Genocide according to you, because it mainly targeted males for execution.

          then cry genocide

          The people who are “crying genocide” are those of us in the international community who know what a geenocide is, including experts in international law.

          • @Monomate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -31 year ago

            If Israel really wanted the destruction of all Gazans, they’d not send their soldiers to a prolonged war. They’d rather send their own missiles and everything would be destroyed in seconds. They have that capability, but they didn’t use it. If it’s really a genocide as you suggest, it’s the dumbest one of all time, because they’re risking their soldiers when they can attack safely and decisively from a distance.

            • @nexguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              It’s possible that they are not flagrantly killing civilians in that manner but are just looking the other way more than they might normally do because they are Palestinians and care less about collateral damage due to race.

          • @Monomate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Dictionary definition: “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.”

    • @Threeme2189@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -111 year ago

      There is a majority of Mizrahi jews (ie: not white) in Israel as compared to “white” jews, mostly from European countries.
      So your comment is fucking stupid.

    • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      It is good.

      I wonder how many other innocent people being murdered justifies saving other innocent people.

      Can you kill 100 to rescue 4. What about 1000 or 10000.

      The fact is they could have accepted any number of ceasefire deals to release these hostages, but they chose to keep murdering more people and further creating the next generation of Hamas signups.

      • @rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The fact is they could have accepted any number of ceasefire deals to release these hostages, but they chose to keep murdering more

        And the fact that hamas could have released them all before the operation was even started.

          • @rdri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            I don’t think it matters how you call them. If you want to label a party bad by calling them terrorists - it’s your choice.

            I know that Israel is able to take care of their own people. Hamas is incapable of that and is willing to kill Palestinians in order to bring any damage to another party. It’s understandable that Israel started the ground operation (maybe not how it goes now, but still). It’s illogical to say that hamas did the right thing with the October 7 events, already because it was obviously useless for their cause.

            • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re just being disingenuous now.

              How is anybody to take care of the Palestinian people when they essentially live in an apartheid state. They have been oppressed by the Israeli government you’re defending for decades now.

              Go have a look at maps over the decades of how much land has been stolen. Regular bombing etc.

              You could read some Finkelstein on the subject, you know the Jewish expert who has researched it most of his life.

              Edit: Notice how I said both sides were terrorists and you only want to focus on one side. That’s called bias my friend.

              • @rdri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -21 year ago

                when they essentially live in an apartheid state.

                Didn’t prevent them from being able to take care of Palestinians instead of building missiles.

                Israeli government you’re defending for decades now.

                What

                Go have a look at maps over the decades of how much land has been stolen

                Yeah, and how exactly hamas changes that?

                Notice how I said both sides were terrorists and you only want to focus on one side.

                All I see is people focusing on calling Israel a monster.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Only in this particular operation. But the war had to get this far for them to conduct it. So the cost is exponentially higher.

            • @Monomate@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -101 year ago

              If you were one of the parents/relatives of the kidnapped israelis, would you still think it was not worth it?

              • @oyo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                81 year ago

                Tens of thousands of innocents dead? Uh… No. I would think there were far more effective methods that should have been used.

              • Sidyctism II.
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                If you were a parent of one of the torn apart kids, would think it was worth it?

                Yeah. Dumb point.

              • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                No, but I’m fully aware I’m a hypocrite there. I think most people are when it comes to their loved ones. If I was family of the hostages, I wouldn’t care how many innocent people died to get them back. I’d support the IDF.

                If I was the family of the nearby Palestinians, I wouldn’t care about the hostages, and I’d let them die if it meant my family would be safe. I’d support Hamas.

                This is why geopolitics can’t be personal. The best decision is not one that you insert yourself into, because you have a much higher threshold for acceptable collateral if it’s your own family on the line.

                At the same time though, this is also a lesson in why a ceasefire is crucial. You put yourself into everyone’s shoes, and you understand why this needs to end. Everyone’s families and loved ones are dying or in captivity, and it’s perpetuating a cycle of violence. It needs to end. Israel has the power to withdraw from Gaza and pursue purely diplomatic means, and it should.

                • @Monomate@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  In the end of the day, it’s the law of the strongest. It’s no accident that Israel hoard a lot of weapons of war and build defensive systems like the Iron Dome. It’s a show of power for a very simple goal: deterrence. I don’t think Israel really though of using all their weapons, but just having them makes every one the enemy nations that surround them to think twice before attacking them. Well, Hamas did not think twice. And they cannot say they didn’t saw it coming.

                  Israel accepting a ceasefire deal would be nice for saving lives and all, but would leave them vulnerable for future missile attacks from Hamas. A nation will always think of its own citizens first. Maybe the Hamas already counted with this reaction of Israel, and though that other Arab countries would form a coalition to fight Israel simultaneously. Well, it didn’t pan out. Deterrence worked after all.

  • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Israeli military had US support in rescuing four captives from Gaza in a “complex daytime operation” in Nuseirat that killed over 200 Palestinians.

    The Palestinian government media office in Gaza said the death toll from Israel’s attack on central Gaza had reached at least 210, with 400 more wounded.

    The Palestinian health ministry confirmed that a large number of dead and wounded Palestinian had arrived at Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospital. It said that most of them were children and women.

    "I came from the camp to here in the hospital on foot. I can’t describe how we fled. I saw dead children and body parts strewn all over as we fled. No one was able to assist them. I saw an elderly man killed on a animal-drawn cart.

    “Nuseirat was being annihilated. It was hell.”

    210 people killed 4 rescued. Mission accomplished everyone. Don’t forget to thank Biden for his direct military involvement in this operation.

    • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      50 civilians killed indiscriminately per 1 hostage freed. And that’s not counting everyone that’s already been killed in this war.

      I think anyone with a shred of morality is heavily conflicted by this. Saving hostages? Great. Killing 50x as many people as those saved? Not great. Not great at all.

      It naturally leads itself to the question we’re all thinking – was it worth it?

      And I think many of us have the same answer, although we may not like it – no. It pains me to say it, but it would’ve been better to let them stay hostage for longer while developing a plan which wouldn’t kill civilians.

      • @Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        Unfortunately, the alternate option was not “let them stay hostage a while longer”. It was “let the hostages die”. And maybe that would have been the more ethical call. But let’s not delude ourselves that they could have been kept alive any other way.

    • @nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Many people are saying if it had been Trump he would have gotten the hostages out in 24 hours. It would have been a perfect operation. The best you’ve seen.

  • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yo mods why you remove my comment?

    Edit: Essentially asking the same questions as JayTreeman.

    Edit 2: It appears my comment was reinstated after I provided a source to counter the misinformation report. I would expect better of the mods to do some due diligence before just censoring comments. There is enough of this in the MSM and it does nothing to further allow people to see what is happening. Thank whichever mod undid the action, hoping it was little_cow but not sure.

  • @frostmore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    i hope amongst the 200 killed,majority are hamas and not innocent people.

    if there are innocent people,i hope justice prevails. if they are hamas,good riddance.