• @just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      They’ve been pulling this shit since the early days. Similar tricks were employed in the 486 days to swap out chips, and again in the Celeron days. I think they switched to the slot style intentionally to keep selling chips to a point lol

        • ☂️-
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          thats why we are in dire need of open source hardware.

          • bruhduh
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            We have open source designs (RISCV also have GPU designs) but we don’t have manufacture power open sourced yet

            • ☂️-
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              i dream of a world where the process will cheapen out enough like pcb design, where you can just submit the design you want and they will fab it out for you.

              with more players coming into the game because of sanctions, i hope we are now on the path.

              • bruhduh
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        IIRC, the slot CPU thing was because they wanted to get the cache closer to the processor, but hadn’t integrated it on-die yet. AMD did the same thing with the original Athlon.

        On a related note, Intel’s anticompetitive and anti- consumer tactics are why I’ve been buying AMD since the K6-2.

        • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They had integrated the L2 on-die before that already with the Pentium Pro on Socket 8. IIRC the problem was the yields were exceptionally low on those Pentium Pros and it was specifically the cache failing. So every chip that had bad cache they had to discard or bin it as a lower spec part. The slot and SECC form factor allowed them to use separate silicon on a larger node by having the cache still be on-package (the SECC board) instead of on-die.

      • @turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s been at least since the “big iron” days.

        Technician comes out to upgrade your mainframe and it consists of installing a jumper to enable the extra features. For only a few million dollars.

  • @mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    Turns out, the difference in the socket is just a few pins here and there, and you can make a 8th or 9th generation Coffee Lake CPU work on your Z170/270 board if you apply a few Kapton tape fixes and mod your BIOS,

    Modders giving me a new reason to keep my ye olde z170 mobo instead of just making a new machine with all the nice hardware

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s been their MO for a long time to keep using the same chipset for as long as possible, if they stop then stop giving either money and just don’t upgrade, not that it really matters with the diminishing return each generation.

        • Pantsofmagic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s really unfortunate they kinda screwed over threadripper customers so bad in this way, but they’re still the lesser evil by a country mile.

    • Em Adespoton
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      It’s in the article; newer gen chips will have extra DRM that will prevent the hacks from working.

      Oh, you meant when will the anti-hacks stop?

      Bless your heart….

  • @bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    That’s cool, but is there a subset of features or cpu bound operations or something that makes it worth going through the trouble just to run a faster(?) cpu with slower memory?

  • @DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I wish there was something for HP 800 G3s. I bought them used after a lot of deliberations and would love to keep it running for as long as I can while not losing out on functionalities.