It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The next product should be a sustainable, not publicly traded company. If investors take majority ownership and IPO, Framework’s perceived mission will evaporate quickly in the inevitable search for ever growing profits. I sincerely hope Nirav and Co actually give a shit about the repairable product and retain majority shares. If not 👉👌…

  • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 year ago

    I’d love to see them make other devices. But I want the company to actually be viable and entrenched before they spread themselves even more thinly.

    They’re already having trouble releasing firmware and driver updates in a timely manner, especially for Windows users who can’t rely on driver updates packaged in the kernel.

    But man I can think of a few cool Framework devices that I’d be into buying…

    • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      How about a repairable phone with a headphone jack?

      The Framework 16 notebook doesn’t even have a headphone jack, only a USB-C to jack adapter.

    • @nezbyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Modular ports would be great. I’d love to have two USB ports on a phone rather than a USB and headphone jack.

      • @catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m pretty sure that a USB hub would work at least on Android, giving you as many ports as you want.

    • @snekerpimp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Repairable, open phone, you can load whatever OS you want. A phone that is more akin to a computer than a smartphone. A pinephone, but better.

    • @CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      A Framework phone with 2 modular Framework sockets would be amazing. I don’t care if it’s thick. Make it repairable and support Linux Phone OSes like postmarketOS and I would absolutely buy it.

  • @pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 year ago

    Surely they are aiming for a repairable and modular smartphone eventually. That’s going to be super hard to do. My guess is their next form factor will be a tablet.

      • @smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        We can say that for any kind of drivers needed to run a mobile phone.\ Manufacturers of components are less and less providing any documentation, just throw a binary blob and say “put it in your Android build”.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Eh, Pinephone and Librem 5 made it work, but there’s still a fair amount of software limitations here, and I didn’t think Framework should be a software company. But the radios themselves probably aren’t the blocker you make them out to be.

        • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          They absolutely did not make it work. Go read any of the reviews and the complete unreliability of the cellular functions of both devices are chief among the criticisms.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            My understanding is that those issues are due to suspend to save battery life, which isn’t directly related to the radios. A more appropriate SOC (i.e. one designed for mobile use) would probably be more reliable with the same radios they selected when going on standby.

    • @iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Tablet is almost free, just don’t have a hinge and have a touchscreen. Release as Chromebook, it will run Android applications

  • @CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Arm machines that are repairable to compete with Apple would be very cool in my opinion. Maybe team up with an integrator like sys76. Could be very cool. I’d personally line up to buy.

  • @devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    As long as the company itself doesn’t become greedy and doesn’t change it’s mission & vision i always support it

  • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m waiting for them to offer a chassis to convert their laptop parts into USFF PCs. Reusing old parts after an upgrade is pretty attractive. I think they mentioned this a while back, I’ve been waiting for it to happen.

    I’d also like to see a thunderbolt or oculink GPU bay part that would enable eGPU use with their machines.

    And if we’re wishlisting top facing speakers would be 🤌

  • @xlash123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I’m sure a Framework phone is at least an idea for them to produce. Definitely an extremely difficult challenge. It would be nice if it allowed for removable RAM, but it could be hard due to SODIMM being relatively large or due to RAM being put on SOCs. I imagine it shouldn’t be too much to ask for removable storage at least, given how small NVME drives can get. Upgradable SOC/motherboard is a must.

  • @brenticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I’m curious to see where they go next. A lot of modern consumer electronics have repairability and upgradeability problems, but I also wouldn’t expect they’d be able to crack into the phone market as easily as the laptop market, so presumably there’s some more niche target they have.

  • @crazyCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Do they offer touchscreens for the laptops yet? I’ve been waiting for that to get one, I won’t get a laptop without it.

    • MightyCuriosity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      This is my issue with Fairphone too. I love the idea and execution and I understand those things cause the product to be more expensive but twice the price to comparable products is just too steep for me.