• @DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1201 year ago

    That headline is a bait and switch.

    One of the major nuclear research facilities belonging to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO)’s is installing a major rooftop solar system that will save $2 million.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      781 year ago

      To be honest even if it was a power plant… they’re already in the business of generating power. If generating more clean power in the same space is an option, that sounds great

      • Sabata11792
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        Power plants still need power to operate and even your own supply is not free.

      • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Yeah, and nuclear reactors use a lot of electrical power anyway. When they’re first starting they need to draw a lot from the grid and they all have powerful backup generators and battery banks to keep the systems online in the event they need to suddenly shutdown the reactor.

        The implausible thing would actually be getting approval to put the panels up, since reactors have high standards for checking the consequences of different materials being used on-site.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Although, why the fuck are we not plastering those giant nuclear vent thingies (the technical term) with solar panels? Or really any surface that can support them?

      • @pizzazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Because solar panel efficiency is already pretty low so it’s best to put them in the areas and in the orientation in which they will receive the most light

  • Bob Robertson IX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    It sounds very dangerous to have a solar system that close to a nuclear facility, much less that close to Earth.

    • Zorque
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Because you can’t have two different sources of energy! It’s antithetical to existence! Only one thing can ever exist or chaos reigns.

      • @slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In bavaria they made exactly this. You have a “Vorzugsgebiet” (loosely translated area of favourited power accumulation) for either wind or solar. Some people then had the outrageous idea of setting up a wind turbine in the middle of a solar park. Guess what happened? It wasn’t approved because it was only allowed to build a solar park there. You can’t make this stuff up. That’s German bureaucracy for you.

    • @Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      They’re in Australia, they’re obviously already connected to the electrical grid, and have the free space. I don’t really see how taking advantage of an obviously free win is in any way a “sick burn” of nuclear.

      • @pendingdeletion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Especially considering this is going on a research facility… and in fact some of their research can benefit the solar industry!!

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Because it’s about nuclear power bad. Saving the planet is secondary to proving one’s moral superiority over other people!

        /s