• @DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1201 year ago

    That headline is a bait and switch.

    One of the major nuclear research facilities belonging to the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO)’s is installing a major rooftop solar system that will save $2 million.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      781 year ago

      To be honest even if it was a power plant… they’re already in the business of generating power. If generating more clean power in the same space is an option, that sounds great

      • Sabata11792
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        Power plants still need power to operate and even your own supply is not free.

      • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        Yeah, and nuclear reactors use a lot of electrical power anyway. When they’re first starting they need to draw a lot from the grid and they all have powerful backup generators and battery banks to keep the systems online in the event they need to suddenly shutdown the reactor.

        The implausible thing would actually be getting approval to put the panels up, since reactors have high standards for checking the consequences of different materials being used on-site.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Although, why the fuck are we not plastering those giant nuclear vent thingies (the technical term) with solar panels? Or really any surface that can support them?

      • @pizzazz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Because solar panel efficiency is already pretty low so it’s best to put them in the areas and in the orientation in which they will receive the most light