“There’s no way to get there without a breakthrough,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Skinner Out Of Touch Meme: Are the AI using toouch energy? Nah, must be the weak energy sources.

    Optimizing power consumption? Why?!

    • @LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 year ago

      Some of the smartest people on the planet are working to make this profitable. It’s fucking hard.

      You are dense and haven’t taking even a look at simple shit like hugging face. Power consumption is about the biggest topic you find with anyone in the know.

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Some of the smartest people on the planet are working to make this profitable. It’s fucking hard.

        [Take a look at] hugging face. Power consumption is about the biggest topic you find with anyone in the know.

        ^ fair comment

    • The Pantser
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 year ago

      Perfect let’s use human brains as CPUs then. Not the whole brain just the unused bits.

        • @Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          371 year ago

          It’s what matrix would’ve been if the studios didn’t think people would too dumb to get it, so we ended with the nonsense about batteries.

          • Bonehead
            link
            fedilink
            301 year ago

            They also thought we wouldn’t understand how Switch could be a woman in the matrix but a man in the real world. So they just made the character a butch woman because apparently that’s easier somehow. So many little changes like this were made.

            • @4am@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              191 year ago

              Holy fuck now her name makes so much more sense. God dammit, why are we so fucking stuck up as a society that we couldn’t even keep that

      • @Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I would love it (if there exists a FOSS variant of that) imagine being able to run a LLM, or even LAM in your head,

        wait…

        🤔

      • @018118055@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        And yet we have brains. This brute force approach to machine learning is quite effective but has problems scaling. So, new energy sources or new thinking?

        • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We just run the AI for a gazillion epochs and then it’s overfitted evolved intelligence. Thanks Darwin we did it again.

  • GigglyBobble
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    How about an efficiency breakthrough instead? Our brains just need a meal and can recognize a face without looking at billions of others first.

    • @Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      I mean, we can only do that because our system was trained for hundreds of thousands, millions of years into being able to recognise others of same species

    • @Damaskox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Erm.

      I recall a study about kids under a specific age that cannot get scared of looking at pictures of demons and other horror stuff because they don’t know yet what your everyday default person looks like.

      So I’d argue that even people need to get accustomed to a thing before they could recognise or have an opinion about anything.

    • @Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      We still need to look at quite a few. And the other billions have been pre-programmed by a couple of billion years of evolution.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      “recognize a face”

      Who’s? Can the human brain just know what someone looks like without prior experience?

      Your ability to do anything is based on decades of “data sets” that you’re being constantly fed, it’s no different than an AI they just get it all at once and we have to learn by individual experience.

  • @agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    Great right from coin miners to the “AI” fad. Tons of carbon shot into the sky and for what? A more unequal society on both counts.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      At least AI has the potential to do something useful unlike coin mining. Although its not doing much currently so not to wild about it. Maybe real ai that could actually find new energy sources.

      • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        General artificial intelligence has the potential to be actually useful. Generative AI, like Chat GPT (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) absolutely does not. It’s a glorified autocomplete.

        • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Chat GPT (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) absolutely does not.

          I had to help my wife with an Excel VBA script. I know a few programming languages but I don’t know vba. Hours of googling turned up no useable scripts that did what I needed. ChatGPT wrote a working VBA script in seconds.

          Anyone who thinks it is a fancy auto complete hasn’t used it.

          • @Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            It is a fancy auto complete, just an incredibly fancy auto complete. In the same way that a computer that can run VR games, simulate the evolution of solar systems let you access something close to the sum total of human knowledge over the internet is a very fancy pocket calculator.

            • @fidodo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I think it’s better explained as a search engine that works at the word level of granularity. It lets you do a word level search of all written human knowledge which allows it to adapt to your specific prompt. It’s the next step in searching knowledge based. First we had libraries, then document search, now it’s word search. I think it’ll be impactful on the same level as the creation of libraries and search engines.

          • @Holzkohlen@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I’d tried using it for python and it made up some fake library that does not exist to handle the complex task I was asking it do it. Utterly useless. The way it works is so complicated is simply has you fooled thinking it’s more than a fancy auto complete, but it is literally exactly that. Just the “smartest” auto complete there is. Don’t worry about it, at least you did not fall it love with it and then left your wife to be with ChatGPT, right?

            • @Womble@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              it’s a tool to be used like any other. If you are relying on it to produce working code with no effort on your part then yes it is likely useless. If you are using it to get you most of the way there its very useful. For example, I’m most comfortable writing python but have been doing a lot of c# recently, asking a code focused LLM questions like “how do you rename a column of a c# datatable” is so much quicker and more useful than trying to search through blogspam its not even funny.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          As someone that works in IT and has seen the actual real world merit of LLMs, you guys clearly don’t work in a white collar field or you’d realize that you sound like someone in the 90’s claiming the internet is a fad.

          Microsoft continues to integrate it, and on prem data and cloud engineers are hooking it up to company resources for everything from helping with data creep to handling low level repetitive tasks.

          In the next ten years all bottom level data entry will be performed entirely by on premise AI models and the position of secretary will be a thing of the past, it’s not a gimmick like NFTs or crypto, it’s an actual tool that we are finding more uses for everyday.

          • @fidodo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            VR and Crypto were bullshit, but AI is the real deal. On a side note I find it hilarious that out of the three options, Zuckerberg bet billions on the two wrong options. Unfortunately the rich have so much power that they can make catastrophic mistakes and still have plenty of money to finally bet on the right one.

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              How is VR bullshit? No Mans Sky, Elite Dangerous, Half Life Alex, more games everyday are using VR.

              Unless you mean the “meta verse” decentraland kinda deal then yeah for sure.

              • @fidodo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                It being the future of computer interfaces is bullshit. I enjoy it as a novelty but Zuckerberg bet on it as the “next big thing”, on par with the Internet.

                • R0cket_M00se
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  They never stopped to ask if it was actually an improvement and just assumed it’s what everyone wanted.

                  Too bad some things are just more convenient on a screen in front of you. I don’t want to walk around a virtual grocery store, the website is fine.

        • HubertManne
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Its a little useful. Its another level of meta. initially research was libraries and books/docs but you could get synopsis from atlases, encyclopedias, dictionaries. Internet allowed for gopher searching and then web browsers allowed search engines but the results did not initially have synapses so you had to check each link. Then synapsis allowed looking through links and just checking the most promising ones. generative ai allows for the most promising links to be identified without perusal. One of the most useful things the ai assitants do is provide you the main links they got their info from.

        • @Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Don’t know why you are being downvoted. This is exactly it. If ChatGPT can find you a solution, then that solution is already out there and it just stole it from some human. That is fundamentally how ChatGPT works, the damn thing can’t think.

          • @dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            How, exactly, do you think learning in humans works? We don’t just spontaneously know things, we build on others works and iterate improvements towards our learning and discovery. You didn’t just know English, you learned it from someone else who learned it ad infinitum until you get back to the earliest stages of complex chemicals we evolved from.

            When considered objectively and rationally, intellectual property is among the most insane imaginary bullshit humanity every came up with and actually adopted as a practice, but here we are. Thoughts and prayers.

      • danielbln
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        In fact, the original script of The Matrix had the machines harvest humans to be used as ultra efficient compute nodes. Executive meddling led to the dumb battery idea .

        • @Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Yea my head cannon is the humans just have no fucking idea what the machines are doing with them and that there was only one movie

        • @fidodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I love their original idea. Having your brainpower sapped and also being part of a collective dream that creates the world around you is such a cooler and more philosophical idea.

    • TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      K̵̡̢̛̦̹̩̳̙͉̫̜̳̫̺̀̀͂͂̔̂̅͆̀͆͛̊͐̇̈́̿̚ń̴͕̲͔̖̼̗̊͂́̌̂̀͆̂̿̀͊́̽̽̃̈́̕̚͝ͅò̶͎̱̮̣̜̰̜̥͕̀̂c̸̢̩͓̹͙̲̖̖͎̤͙̥͎̦̦̼͖̩͍̞̪̙̯̺̝̥̑̄̓̋̇͜͝ͅͅk̶̡̛̟̬̳͖̦͓̣̗͈̗̟̥̩͚̤̱̜̰͖̩̊̽̈́̒̉͗̌̈́̐̂̊͐̈́̄͘͠͝͠ ̸̧͉̤̮̗̟͖̩̫̪͙̑͜͠k̷͙͚̀̑͌̀̄͗͜͝͠n̵̢̫̻͉̙̖̱͙̺͌͛́́̇̏̃͝ó̶̜͎̫̺̪̲͓̩͇͖̤̣̻̻̲̲̤̪̜̞̽̀͊̒͗̇͌͆̉̇̄̈́̇͗́͂͜c̷̨̛͚̠̤̼̙̹͓̤̳͔̪͖̰͚͈͓͉̳͍͓͔͎̞͈͈̭̑̂́͌͋́͊͑̇͜k̵̦̞͉̈̒̊̎͂̐̽̏̉́̏̋̀̾̋͛̎̏̿̚̕͝͝͝,̶̳̩͎̩̥͔͉̟̻̘͔̞̗̯͕͕̊̐̂́͋̑̂̑́̌̓̕̕͘͘͜͝͝͝ ̴̮̭̯̳̥͔̘̪͎̦͍̆̎ͅN̴̨̡̧̢̛̛̛͎̹͍͕̥͈̘̜̲͍͓̥̗̭͕̩͉̞̗͕̝͚̺͒̈́̇̿͑̂̍̆͗̒̏͆̓̓͆͘̚͠͝͝͝ẻ̵̛͙̝̰̱͓͔͇̘̼̳͔̳̲̘̞̑͑̈́͛̀̎͛̔́͑͆͂̈́́̓́͐̍̋͒̿̐́̄̃̈́̎͜ọ̷̢̪̬͍̞̩̦̰̟̹̳̬̮̆̊̐̏̈̆͊̐͛̓́̕̚͘.̸̯̮͇̳̮̌̅̈́̎

  • @ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Didn’t CERN open a portal to hell recently, can’t we just steal their power? What are they using it for what could go wrong?

  • yildo
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    We must disassemble the solar system and make paperclips AI server farms

  • @stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    I love when people invent something then complain about how dangerous it is. It really hits you in the feels.

    • @Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      In the end, as always, it will only benefit the companies. And all the people get is put out of a job because they have been replaced by some piece of software no one even understands anymore.

      • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        This is a silly take, people have benefitted hugely from all the big tech developments in the past and will do from ai also - just as you have a mobile phone that can save and improve your life in a myriad of ways so you’ll have access to various forms of ai which will do similar. GPS is a good example, functionally free and making navigation far safer, faster, and better.

        Here’s a genuine already happened use case for ai benefitting you, an open source developer was able to add a whole load of useful features to their free software by using AI to help code - I know because it was me, among many many others.

        I know people making open source ai tools too and they’re all using AI coding assistants - mostly the free ones. I’ve seen a lot of academic researchers using AI tools also generally built using open source tools like pytorch and with help from ai coding tools. Even if you don’t use ai yourself you’re already benefitting from it, even if you don’t use open source software the services you rely on do.

        Imagine being able to implement the most advanced and newest methodologies in your design process or get answers to complex and niche questions about new technology instantly. You buy a printer for example and say to your computer ‘I’ve plugged in a printer make it work’ and it says ‘ok, there isn’t a driver available that’ll work with your pc but I’ve written one based on the spec in the datasheet, do you want me to print a test page?’

        Imagine being able to say ‘talk me through diagnosing a fault on my washing machine’ and it guides you through locating and fixing the fault, possibly by designing a replacement part and giving you fabrication options.

        Or being able to say ‘this website is annoying, change it so that I only see the video window’ or ‘make a playlist in release order of all abba songs that charted’ or ‘check on currently available archives to see if there’s a mirror of this deleted post’ or ‘check all the sites and see if anyone posted a sub version of the next episode of this anime’ or ‘Keep an eye on this lemmy community and add any popular memes involving fish to my feed but don’t bother with any meta stuff or aquatic mammals’ or ‘this advert says I can make free money, is it ligit?’

        The use cases that will directly benefit your life are almost endless, natural language computing is a huge deal even without task based solvers and physical automation but we also have those too so the increased ability of people to make community projects and freely shared designs is huge.

  • JJROKCZ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Or we could stop this ridiculous llm “ai” trend and move towards sustainable living like our hyper-waste society

    • @Falcon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      These comments often indicate a lack of understanding about ai.

      Ml algorithms have been in use for nearly 50 years. They certainly become much more common since about 2012, particularly with the development of CUDA, It’s not just some new trend or buzz word.

      Rather, what we starting to see are the fruits of our labour. There are so many really hard problems that just cannot be solved with deductive reasoning.

    • @Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      All it costs is power, one of the easiest things to make sustainable until we can make a computer that runs on beans.

      AI is already too useful to give up, it’s not “ridiculous”

    • stopthatgirl7OP
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      That requires someone in business to think beyond the next quarter’s profits.

    • JJROKCZ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Not efficiently and not as reliably as a nuclear reactor though. It would if they built a space station in an orbit with minimal other objects getting in the way of it and the sun. Teach the ai in between Sol and Venus and bring it back if it discovers anything useful rather than making revenge porn and plagiarizing artists

      • @andrai@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        1 GW of solar is much cheaper than 1 GW of nuclear. Solar is both cheaper to build and cheaper to run. It’s the most efficient energy source e currently have.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          It also turns on and off outside of any human control.

        • @apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Plus it doesn’t have the con of meltdown and nuclear fallout. Safer nuclear power is still potentially fucking dangerous for life for 20000 years. Nuclear fission energy is the height of human hubris.

        • GigglyBobble
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Nuclear produces that 1 GW 24/7 and all year though. My solar panels vastly overproduce on most summer days and are worthless at nights and from fall to spring.

          • @kalleboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            If we’re still talking about AI, you can ramp up the AI training and batch workloads when the sun is shining and stop them overnight. It’s one of those things like aluminum smelters where you can adjust the load