Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is “total mess,” may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

  • @logicbomb@lemmy.worldEnglish
    27•1 year ago

    This is a complicated situation, but in my opinion, probably the correct decision.

    Given this is the ruling, if you do believe your phone is about to be confiscated, and you don’t want its contents to be used as evidence, it might be a good idea to turn off your phone. Although the police cannot compel a password, a biometric unlock is not a password. If you turn off your phone, it will generally require a password to enable biometric unlock.

    • @sorghum@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      23•1 year ago

      It’s not complicated at all. The constitution guarantees the right that no one be compelled to testify against themselves.

    • @Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4•1 year ago

      Most phones have a way to use a button sequence force the next lock to require a PIN code. iPhone is just hitting the side button 5x for instance.

      • @phoneymouse@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2•1 year ago

        Or squeeze volume up button and power button. Encrypts your data and requires passcode unlock. Also, set a long passcode like 10 digits. 4 can be cracked in minutes. 6 can be cracked in a few hours.