• Pennomi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    The explanation? The media is intentionally full of anti-EV propaganda.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hahaha, you don’t need anti-ev propaganda. They don’t work for most people, they cost way more than ICE, and their enviro benefits haven’t been demonstrated.

      To that last point before you go off saying they have, then where are the spreadsheets showing eery detail of both? Because that’s how business makes decisions - we analyze the living daylights out of every angle, every possible way to present a piece of data.

      I do risk analysis as part of my job - I’ve done more analysis for a single upgrade to a piece of software/hardware than I’ve ever seen published for Ev’s. If you want to convince people, it would simple with some clear analysis.

      That we don’t see that analysis published with easy access, and shouted from the rooftops, tells me all I need to know.

      If anying, the pro-ev propaganda has been nuts for years.

      • BargsimBoyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        Wow. I feel bad for the company that employs you. Some very biased analysis going on there.

      • @dynamojoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Where are the spreadsheets showing eery detail of both?

        The questions you have to answer to build such a spreadsheet decide the result, not the data. How many kinds of cars are out there? What’s their cost vs. comfort, cost vs. performance, cost vs. efficiency or cost vs. reliability? Not even considering powertrain you’re already drowning in data, and that’s assuming customers are rational. If they were, the “correct” car, SUV, and truck would already be decided.