• @Ejh3k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1022 years ago

    About a decade ago or so, I found myself in a reddit argument with someone that claimed they had never attempted to plug a USB in unsuccessfully. They said that every single time they’ve plugged in, it was the correct way. Some people are insane.

    • @hcbxzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Perhaps a controversial opinion here, but the usefulness of reversibility is vastly overrated. It’s not a game changer, just a tiny first-world luxury that’s nice to have, but it does it by introducing a bunch of unnecessary complexity that I’d rather avoid. Not worth the trade off IMO. I can count on one hand the number of minutes USB-C has saved me by being reversible and I honestly don’t care

      • @Ejh3k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        I’m happier with how long usb c last before they start getting finicky than I am the reversiblity.

        • @hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          In theory, USB-C should be better, but in practice, the quality control is all over the place.

          All of my micro USB cables and ports have lasted just fine. I used one daily with my phone for 10+ years with no issues, and I’ve only had maybe two cables ever actually fail. Meanwhile, I’ve already had at least 5 USB-C cables or dongles that have fully failed, and plus the primary USB-C charging port on a laptop just completely die. I wish it was better, but it just isn’t.

          Also if USB-C was just replacing just micro USB I’d be ok with that. But the problem is they’re also replacing USB-A, and Type C is not nearly as durable as Type A since it’s so small, it’s just physically impossible. I wish they made a larger version of the Type C port. Same shape, same pins, just bigger in every dimension. As large as Type A, for durability.

          I’m not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It’s way more durable in practice since it’s just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

      • @Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        The issue is that USBC was the first standard to really take the mechanical design process seriously in a consumer context. In doing so, it was made both way more ergonomic and way more durable. I’d argue that without the focus on some of these “small but marketable” consumer-oriented bits, we would not have gotten the great overall connector design we did.

        • @hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 years ago

          I’m not a big fan of Apple, but the lightning connector is just better, physically. It’s way more durable in practice since it’s just a solid piece. I wish USB-C was designed that way instead of what we actually got.

          • @owatnext@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            If I recall correctly, Lightning connectors are designed in a way that makes the port more likely to wear out. USB-C is designed in a way that makes the cable more likely to wear out. I would rather replace my $5 charging cable than replace my $150 (or more!) phone.

      • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I am just laughing here because I spent the day dealing with ancient serial tech pigtails and DB9s. You people have no idea the pain of losing multiple days of your life trying to get RS-232 to work. Especially when stuff doesn’t follow the standards it is supposed to follow.

    • LazaroFilm
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Well if you only plugged one USB in your life you have a 50% chance of never having plugged it in wrong.

    • @Squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean if you tend to plug things in at the same computer a lot it’s pretty easy to always plug things in right the first time, even when not looking because you just kinda know what way it’s meant to be. And laptops usually have all theirs pointing the same way so you know one you know them all. If something has text on it, it’s usually oriented in such a way that when plugged in you can read it. Or they have a little face and you know which way the face is meant to be facing

      I have a similar “power” and while I’m not flawless, it’s only really new or unfamiliar devices/computers that trip me up. Or plugs that don’t actually have any identifying features and/or unusual ones

    • @dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      That person is either a flat out liar, or they are incredibly anal and waste a lot of time looking at the connector and input every single time they connect a cable.

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I don’t really have a problem looking at the connector before plugging it in. I thought this was an overblown meme.

    • @anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      If you can see through the two rectangular cutouts on the plug, it’s the right way around. Unfortunately, this doesn’t help if the plug is turned 90°, and also some computers have it upside down (looking at you, GPD).

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      If it’s on a laptop I could see it. The empty half almost always needs to be on top on the male side because the female end is almost always plastic on top.