Currently #10 free social app on Google Play.

    • RubénM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      732 years ago

      Yes, 3 ad networks (one not in use) and Firebase (crash reporting and analytics) Twitter Mopub is wrong. It is not included in the app.

      • @Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        I got down voted the other day stating that just paying for the app would disable all that. Devs need to make money too. It’s either ads and tracking or pay some how.

        Outside of a few amazing people out there who do this just for fun, most people would like some kind of return on investment.

        Am I wrong?

    • @hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      I mean the dev spent his time building it, why shouldn’t he show ads on it? Software = work.

        • Norgur
          link
          fedilink
          512 years ago

          Because people donated their time to make them. You can’t blame anyone for not doing that.

        • @wildcardology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 years ago

          I’ve used them all and even considered staying with voyager. But after one hour of using boost I uninstalled all of them.

          • @seaQueue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            I worked my way through just about every Reddit client available for Android and Boost was the only one that wasn’t super annoying. I’m happy to support development of an app that I use every day, especially if it wouldn’t be available at all otherwise.

        • @Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -252 years ago

          I tried the same argument here. Don’t bother. They don’t want to see it.

          • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            No, we see it - it’s just dumb. Having a free as in freedom and beer set of clients is great for lemmy - but also having market driven clients available is healthy for catering to individual preferences. Boost existing isn’t your problem - clients that you like exist and please go enjoy them. I’m not certain why you’re lurking here, is it just out of masochism? The person you’re replying to at least put out helpful information about the application.

            More choice is a good thing and four dollars for an app forever is extremely reasonable.

              • @hperrin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Then buy the ad free version or don’t use it. The initial comment here is FUD.

                If you’re worried about feeding the advertisers, then buying software is the best course of action. All software development takes time, and time is money. Sometimes, developers will give away their time for free, but demanding that someone do that is completely unreasonable.

    • CodeMonkeyUK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Incorrect, you are “free” to not use it. You are also “free” to develop your own app using your own time and skills.

    • Dojan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -25
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Was about to say, wasn’t there some requirement about Boost basically getting access to everything on your phone? I didn’t read much into the details, just saw some complaint about it the other day, thought “yikes” and moved on. After then it’s been a bit weird to see all the cheer for Boost.

      Edit: found the thread.

      • @kyle1320@lemmy.world
        cake
        OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Did you read the comments? The dev himself addressed the concerns, to the point where the OP updated his post (emphasis is mine)

        Edit to say this blew up. I didn’t realise I was kicking as big a hornet’s nest and haven’t read all the comments yet.

        To be clear, what I don’t like about this and other provisions in the terms is the language and implications around data use. I’ve no problem with ads being shown - I want developers to get paid for the work they do and that makes it possible for users to have “free” access to software if they can’t afford to purchase.

        I also want to add the response from Boost’s dev below to make sure it’s visible. You’ll see that it is boilerplate but required by Google and was present in Boost for reddit. I just hadn’t seen it because I purchased it immediately based on a recommendation. It doesn’t make me happy about it but does remove some doubts I was having about the direction Boost is heading.

        • Dojan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Nope, like I wrote.

          I didn’t read much into the details, just saw some complaint about it the other day, thought “yikes” and moved on.

          This part

          I also want to add the response from Boost’s dev below to make sure it’s visible. You’ll see that it is boilerplate but required by Google and was present in Boost for reddit. I just hadn’t seen it because I purchased it immediately based on a recommendation. It doesn’t make me happy about it but does remove some doubts I was having about the direction Boost is heading.

          Does paint a different picture though. Thank you. :)

      • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        , wasn’t there some requirement about Boost basically getting access to everything on your phone?

        No