Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

  • @adriaan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    That would be a much better comparison if it was artificial intelligence, but these are just reinforcement learning models. They do not get inspired.

    • Shurimal
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      just reinforcement learning models

      …like the naturally occuring neural networks are.

      • Khalic
        link
        fedilink
        242 years ago

        The brain does not work the way you think… (I work in the field, bio-informatics). What you call “neural networks” come from an early misunderstanding of how the brain stores information. It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          It’s a LOT more complicated and frankly, barely understood.

          Yet you confidently state that the brain doesn’t work the way LLMs do?

          Obviously it doesn’t work exactly the same way that LLMs do, if only because of the completely different substrates. But when you get to more nebulous concepts like “creativity” and “inspiration” it’s not so clear.

          • @lloram239@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            The part where brain and neural net differ is in the learning via backpropagation, that seem to be done different in the brain, as there is no mechanism to go backwards through the network and jiggle the weights.

            That aside, they seem to work very similar once they are trained, as the knowledge they are able to extract from data ends up being basically the same that a human would be able to extract. There is surprisingly little weirdness in AI and a surprising amount of human-like capabilities.