NASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordable::“At current cost levels the SLS program is unsustainable.”

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    Maybe if we gave a little less to SpaceX, NASA could afford to do more.

    • @InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      Can I ask: do you actually believe NASA builds their own rockets themselves? Like out back in their shed with a table saw and pliers?

      The prime contractor on the sls is boeing.

    • @weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If NASA cancelled every single contact they had with SpaceX… they might be able to afford 1/3rd of an SLS launch. Or maybe not, because then they’d have to start paying Russians for rides up to the ISS.

      SpaceX is saving NASA boatloads of money. Which Congress is forcing them to waste on SLS.

    • @Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Even then, commercial launch providers get much further with less money. Sure, if NASA had more budget, they could afford the SLS program. But the commercial launch providers show that they could be more efficient with the money they do have.

    • MrSpArkle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      That would destroy US space capabilities. Just because Elon is a racist dipshit doesn’t mean we should stop building the best rockets in the world.

      Honestly if we have less money to Boeing and more to spacex, NASA would be way better off.