If someone draws a conclusion from the facts it could be biased, but this is just merely data. You could say that it is framing a certain set of results, (since it doesn’t say anything about how pleasant a trip by car is compared to a trip by bicycle for example), but the collection data seems to done perfectly neutral.
No I totally agree but it would be framing which is not the same as being biased, and the title implies a causation but doesn’t actually say there is one. Also could have kept quiet because i don’t really disagree with op.
If someone draws a conclusion from the facts it could be biased, but this is just merely data. You could say that it is framing a certain set of results, (since it doesn’t say anything about how pleasant a trip by car is compared to a trip by bicycle for example), but the collection data seems to done perfectly neutral.
The title is framing the statistics with the implication that bike lanes and car restrictions are the cause.
(Fuck electric cars)
No I totally agree but it would be framing which is not the same as being biased, and the title implies a causation but doesn’t actually say there is one. Also could have kept quiet because i don’t really disagree with op.