• @GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 days ago

    yes, because the real problem is too much choice.

    fuckin finbro bullshit.

    I remember paying $10 for an Atari game. I know it’s not a great comparison, but I got hundreds if not thousands of hours of gameplay out of Qbert. Can any of the leading games in the last decade do that?

    It’s funny I mention Atari. They had so many games to play. the choices you had were bonkers. best part was you could take your carts to a friends house and trade or share.

    can’t do that today since most games are digital downloads that need 32gb day-0 updates.

    perhaps the problem isn’t the gamers, but instead it’s the greedy corporate interests that are poisoning the game industry requesting $80 single owner games.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 days ago

      I don’t disagree with you, but there’s no way you have thousands of hours in Qbert. Even hundreds is impressive.

        • Krudler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 days ago

          That really dramatically takes the steam out of your argument though.

          If the same conditions for you existed today, any modern game would blow qbert out of the water, and indeed you would put thousands of hours into it.

          Also, Atari games were $20 when they were new not 10. So with inflation it’s about the same as an $80 game today.

      • @MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 days ago

        The other thing is that there was simply fewer games back then so you either continue to play the good games you own or you don’t play games. I loved Ocarina of Time, but I’m not going to pretend it was God’s gift to mankind just because I played it tons in my youth. I played it tons in my youth because it was one of the best games that I owned, and even then I had plenty more options than I’m sure this person had on the Atari for good games