• @WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    167 days ago

    Well, we’re going to have to figure out how to level off or shrink our population eventually. Might as well do it now while there are still some wild animal species that haven’t gone extinct.

    • @MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 days ago

      A lower population isn’t that bad. It’s just that the transition when you have a very large old population and a small young one is very difficult.

      • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Watch this video, ignore the clickbait sounding title:

        https://youtu.be/Ufmu1WD2TSk

        It completely changed my view on that.

        Basically, without high birth rates, countries are totally screwed. Immigration (which skews young, from high birth rate countries), has softened that issue for the US, hence you don’t hear about it as much here. One can wave their hands and say “elder care and the economy will be automated in the future,” but that’s wishful thinking if you ask me.

        Figuring out how to more efficiently house/care for a glut of humans farther in the future is way more practical. Honestly we’re ridiculously inefficient now; there’s a lot of low hanging fruit to pick. And we can use much higher technology to address that.