It garbles advertisers’ data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can’t work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

  • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10613 days ago

    Couple of issues I’m wondering about…

    First, wouldn’t clicking on everything just make you easier to track?

    Second, how much bandwidth would all this use?

      • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4713 days ago

        The advertisers are paying for the opportunity either way. Clicks cost them more money than just displaying the ad. Useless clicks cost them money for nothing.

        • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 days ago

          The advertisers could be paying based on interactions and/or their rates could be negotiated around interaction, so unless a sizeable number of people use this it would be giving money to Goog

      • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3113 days ago

        No, because it devalues their click through, as no sales will result from those clicks.

        It’s kinda like printing money, there’s more of it, but the overall value hasn’t increased.

      • @cageythree@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        In the short term, I would think so.

        In the long run, it makes it less appealing for companies to advertise, because they would have larger costs while having less sales. That, in return, hurts Google as advertisers don’t want to pay as much anymore. If 80% of all users used this extension, advertisers would have to pay more than ever, while having only 20% of all users can be reached (simplified, of course).

        Or in short, it’s designed to hurt the system as a whole, not specific companies.