• @BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    323 months ago

    There was no reason to do this other than stay out of Trumps retaliation zone. It is wrong to say operated by the state when it is operated by the province.

    • @GrizzlyBur@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      My theory is that some asshole at google thought it was soo much to keep track of what every government globally calls their government operated parks and nature reserves, and just wanted a blanket term for it and went for “state park”, with no consideration for how itd piss most countries off.

      • @BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        I doubt it, its the same issue with google changing Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America recently. Its a USA thing, all other mapping systems still have it as Gulf of Mexico because they aren’t bowing to trump and elon. A state and a province are not the same, provinces have less autonomy than a state.

      • @CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        23 months ago

        oh, thats 100% what happened.

        “should we vary what these are called by country?”

        “ehh, that would cost like $10,000 of developer time around the globe, just standardize it”

        • @BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          93 months ago

          No its the same as the recent Google move of renaming Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America, it is not easier, it just appeases trumps new mandates. Open Map systems around the world already include terms for Country/State/Province/territory, etc. Its a tag label in a program field.

            • @BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              63 months ago

              Online articles say people have screenshots from a few days ago as of Provincial and now it says State Park, so even if google did make a back end change before January then the timing is odd for it to be showing changes now.

          • @dankm@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Some were, some weren’t. This goes back almost to the beginning of Google Maps, but seems they’ve started to standardize them recently. They claim they started before Trump’s inauguration.

    • JokeDeity
      link
      fedilink
      -33 months ago

      No one here is on Trump’s side, so I’m not defending Google, but it is common parlance to refer to the government of a nation as “the state” even when the nation has no states.

      • breakfastmtn
        link
        fedilink
        123 months ago

        They have a separate category for national parks. This is specifically referring to sub-national governments.

      • @BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        63 months ago

        Except we had terms prior for google and openmaps to consider actual state vs province because provinces are a different type of designation in a country. I.e. Canada has provinces and territories, and are not fully autonomous like a state. This is google purposely changing a system to suit US use, while other map systems maintain the preestablish parlance.

      • @Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Cool but provincial parks are not run by the state. National parks are. Try pushing the narrative for Google and trump somewhere else.