This includes some porn subreddits as well as subreddits like /r/Drugs. Apparently due to being “unmoderated”, but some were not. What are your thoughts?

Edit: apparently also subreddits like /r/transgender_surgeries are banned too. Definitely feels politically motivated. Edit 2: seems like at least some (?) bans are being undone, like the above mentioned ones.

  • @DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    49
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I have absolutely no idea what these companies are doing.

    Are they afraid of Trump? Are they afraid of Musk? Are they afraid of the combination of both?

    Idk, I thought two incompetent idiots like them would be no threat to the corpos of America, even in the oval office. But maybe I overestimated the corpos.

    Or are they jumping on the band wagon voluntarily? It’s so weird to me…

    • @moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My wife works in medical research for a company you’ve probably heard of. Talking about diversity is a big part of her job, not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it’s scientifically necessary. If they don’t have a diverse population on a study, the data will be skewed.

      She’s no longer allowed to talk about diversity. She’s not even allowed to say the word. She had to remove slides from a presentation she was giving.

      • @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        Replace with the term “heterogeneous sample”. The prefix hetero- should comfort those snowflakes.

      • @Monstrosity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        Why does she comply so willingly?

        Not to pick on her, I get it, sort of, but maybe just “forget” to remove the slides?

        Small acts of resistance pile up & those of us with even a crumb of privilege must speak & act now to protect those who don’t even have that.

        • @moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 months ago

          It’s a valid question.

          She pushed back to her managers and was told they’re following up with the legal department. So hopefully it gets fixed higher up.

          Maybe you’re right that she should use this as an opportunity to resist, but that resistance wouldn’t make it outside of these little meetings.

          • @Monstrosity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            I don’t want to be too hard on anybody, this is scary shit.

            It’s just something to keep in mind.

        • @garbagebagel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Sorry that this is a dumb question but for any Americans out there: how is it that the federal government can control what state governments or private companies are doing in regards to even TALKING about diversity? Like, is it fully illegal to talk about it? Cause that seems way more far reaching than just removing the policies directly related to dei hiring.

          And also, if it’s a private company why does the government even get a say in their specific policies?

      • @Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What about euphemisms?

        “We have to cast a wide net during the study to prevent the data from being skewed”

        There will always be a way to maliciously comply, it’s just a question of how much shit you’ll get for doing so.